Androgen receptor markers do not differ between nonresponders and responders to resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy

Author(s):Show less -

Bergamasco, Joao G. A. ; Scarpelli, Maira C. ; Godwin, Joshua S. ; Mesquita, Paulo H. C. ; Chaves, Talisson S. ; da Silva, Deivid G. ; Bittencourt, Diego ; Dias, Nathalia F. ; Medalha Jr, Ricardo A. ; Carello Filho, Paulo C. ; Angleri, Vitor ; Costa, Luiz A. R. ; Michel, J. Max ; Vechin, Felipe C. ; Kavazis, Andreas N. ; Ugrinowitsch, Carlos ; Roberts, Michael D. ; Libardi, Cleiton A.

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: Journal of Applied Physiology; v. 137, n. 4, p. 9-pg., 2024-10-15.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether baseline values and acute and chronic changes in androgen receptors (AR) markers, including total AR, cytoplasmic (cAR), and nuclear (nAR) fractions, as well as DNA-binding activity (AR-DNA), are involved in muscle hypertrophy responsiveness by comparing young nonresponder and responder individuals. After 10 wk of resistance training (RT), participants were identified as nonresponders using two typical errors (TE) obtained through two muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) ultrasound measurements (2 x TE; 4.94%), and the highest responders within our sample were numerically matched. Muscle biopsies were performed at baseline, 24 h after the first RT session (acute responses), and 96 h after the last session (chronic responses). AR, cAR, and nAR were analyzed using Western blotting, and AR-DNA was analyzed using an ELISA-oligonucleotide assay. Twelve participants were identified as nonresponders (Delta mCSA: -1.32%) and 12 as responders (Delta mCSA: 21.35%). There were no baseline differences between groups in mCSA, AR, cAR, nAR, or AR-DNA (P > 0.05). For acute responses, there was a significant difference between nonresponders (+19.5%) and responders (-14.4%) in AR-DNA [effect size (ES) = -1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.53 to -0.16; P = 0.015]. There were no acute between-group differences in any other AR markers (P > 0.05). No significant differences between groups were observed in chronic responses across any AR markers (P > 0.05). Nonresponders and responders presented similar baseline, acute, and chronic results for the majority of the AR markers. Thus, our findings do not support the influence of AR markers on muscle hypertrophy responsiveness to RT in untrained individuals. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We explored, for the first time, the influence of androgen receptor (AR) through the separation of cytoplasmic and nuclear cell fractions [i.e., cytoplasmic androgen receptor (cAR), nuclear androgen receptor (nAR), and androgen receptor DNA-binding activity (AR-DNA)] on muscle hypertrophy responsiveness to resistance training. The absence of muscle hypertrophy in na & iuml;ve individuals does not seem to be explained by baseline values, and acute or chronic changes in AR markers. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 23/04739-2 - RESISTANCE TRAINING PROGRESSION: EFFECTS ON THE REMODELING OF THE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX IN HUMANS
• Grantee: Cleiton Augusto Libardi
• Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants