New historical archeointensity data from Brazil: Evidence for a large regional non-dipole field contribution over the past few centuries

Author(s)

Hartmann, Gelvam A. ^{[1, 2]} ; Genevey, Agnes ^[3] ; Gallet, Yves ^[2] ; Trindade, Ricardo I. F. ^[1] ; Le Goff, Maxime ^[2] ; Najjar, Rosana ^[4] ; Etchevarne, Carlos ^[5] ; Afonso, Marisa C. ^[6]

Affiliation

^[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Geofis, Inst Astron Geofis & Ciencias Atmosfer, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo - Brazil

^[2] CNRS, UMR 7154, Inst Phys Globe Paris, Equipe Paleomagnetisme, F-75005 Paris - France

^[3] CNRS, UMR 171, Ctr Rech & Restaurat Musees France, F-75001 Paris - France

^[4] Inst Patrimonio Hist & Artist Nacl, Assessoria Arqueol, BR-20090002 Rio De Janeiro - Brazil

^[5] Univ Fed Bahia, Dept Antropol, Predio Fac Med, BR-40026100 Salvador, BA - Brazil

^[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Museu Arqueol & Etnol, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo - Brazil

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters; v. 306, n. 1-2, p. 66-76, JUN 1 2011.
• Web of Science Citations: 31

Abstract

We report new archeointensity data obtained from the analyses of baked clay elements (architectural and kiln brick fragments) sampled in Southeast Brazil and historically and/or archeologically dated between the end of the XVIth century and the beginning of the XXth century AD. The results were determined using the classical Thellier and Thellier protocol as modified by Coe, including partial thermoremanent magnetization (pTRM) and pTRM-tail checks, and the Triaxe protocol, which involves continuous high-temperature magnetization measurements. In both protocols, TRM anisotropy and cooling rate TRM dependence effects were taken into account for intensity determinations which were successfully performed for 150 specimens from 43 fragments, with a good agreement between intensity results obtained from the two procedures. Nine site-mean intensity values were derived from three to eight fragments and defined with standard deviations of less than 8%. The site-mean values vary from similar to 25 mu T to similar to 42 mu T and describe in Southeast Brazil a continuous decreasing trend by similar to 5 mu T per century between similar to 1600 AD and similar to 1900 AD. Their comparison with recent archeointensity results obtained from Northeast Brazil and reduced at a same latitude shows that: (1) the geocentric axial dipole approximation is not valid between these southeastern and northeastern regions of Brazil, whose latitudes differ by similar to 10 degrees, and (2) the available global geomagnetic field models (gufm1 models, their recalibrated versions and the CALSK3 models) are not sufficiently precise to reliably reproduce the non-dipole field effects which prevailed in Brazil for at least the 1600-1750 period. The large non-dipole contribution thus highlighted is most probably linked to the evolution of the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) during that period. Furthermore, although our dataset is limited, the Brazilian archeointensity data appear to support the view of a rather oscillatory behavior of the axial dipole moment during the past three centuries that would have been marked in particular by a moderate increase between the end of the XVIIIth century and the middle of the XIXth century followed by the well-known decrease from 1840 AD attested by direct measurements. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. (AU)