Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Monitoring the structure of restored forests and assessing aboveground carbon density through canopy metrics derived from digital aerial photogrammetry and LiDAR

Full text
Author(s):
Show less -
Santoro, Giulio B. ; Molin, Paulo G. ; Viveiros, Jose M. S. M. ; Ferreira, Giovanna de Andrade ; Costa, Vinicius M. ; Haneda, Leo E. ; Sinegalia, Melodie K. S. D. ; Cullen Jr, Laury ; Brancalion, Pedro H. S. ; Silva, Carlos A. ; de Almeida, Danilo R. A.
Total Authors: 11
Document type: Journal article
Source: RESTORATION ECOLOGY; v. N/A, p. 14-pg., 2025-05-02.
Abstract

Monitoring forest dynamics is crucial to understanding forest succession drivers and ensuring successful restoration outcomes. Laser scanners onboard robust drone systems are valuable for penetrating forest canopies and providing structural details. With the growing accessibility to low-cost drones equipped with advanced optical sensors, photogrammetry emerges as a potential and cost-effective alternative for monitoring forest restoration. Our goal was to explore the potential of monitoring tropical forest restoration sites using low-cost drones as an alternative to airborne laser scanning. Using linear regression, we compared five canopy-derived metrics as well as aboveground carbon density (AGCD) models fitted from mean canopy height. Data were collected over 30 plots of 900 m2 sampled across restoration plantations of different ages. Results showed a strong relationship between both laser scans and low-cost optical sensors for canopy metrics, with r2 = 0.83-0.99, root mean squared error (RMSE) % = 5.41-27.25%, and mean absolute error (MAE) % = 3.81-16.41%. Central tendencies (e.g. mean height) were more reliably estimated, while metrics related to canopy height variation tended to be overestimated by optical sensors. The AGCD models showed little difference, with high r2 values (0.87 and 0.86) and very similar estimated RMSE% (30.02 and 31.33%) and MAE% (25.15 and 25.37%), for both laser scanners and optical sensors, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that digital aerial photogrammetry can produce results comparable to laser scanning in assessing the canopy structure of restored forests, serving as a cost-efficient alternative for restoration monitoring, particularly in regions with financial or logistical constraints for laser scanner surveys. However, optical data have limitations in capturing reliable terrain information in densely forested areas. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 22/11438-6 - Using deep learning to identify invasive Pinus spp. in wetlands
Grantee:Giovanna de Andrade Ferreira
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Scientific Initiation
FAPESP's process: 23/00241-0 - Modeling aboveground biomass in São Paulo State Atlantic Forest: an upscalling approach
Grantee:Giulio Brossi Santoro
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate
FAPESP's process: 20/15792-3 - Creating spaces for ecosystem restoration by increasing operational efficiency in the harvest of sugarcane
Grantee:Giulio Brossi Santoro
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Master
FAPESP's process: 18/21338-3 - Monitoring forest landscape restoration from unmanned aerial vehicles using Lidar and hyperspectral remote sensing
Grantee:Danilo Roberti Alves de Almeida
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral
FAPESP's process: 24/08886-2 - Aboveground forest carbon mapping in São Paulo by fusing GEDI spaceborne LiDAR and Planet Scope satellite images
Grantee:Giulio Brossi Santoro
Support Opportunities: Scholarships abroad - Research Internship - Doctorate
FAPESP's process: 18/18416-2 - Understanding restored forests for benefiting people and nature - NewFor
Grantee:Pedro Henrique Santin Brancalion
Support Opportunities: BIOTA-FAPESP Program - Thematic Grants
FAPESP's process: 21/11940-0 - Restoration of native vegetation in the Atlantic Forest through the strategic combination of mandatory measures and voluntary commitments - CCD-EMA
Grantee:Paulo Guilherme Molin
Support Opportunities: Research Grants - Science Centers for Development