Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Efficacy of liposome-encapsulated mepivacaine for infiltrative anesthesia in volunteers

Full text
Author(s):
Tofoli, Giovana R. [1, 2] ; Cereda, Cintia M. S. [1] ; Groppo, Francisco C. [3] ; Volpato, Maria C. [3] ; Franz-Montan, Michelle [1] ; Ranali, Jose [3] ; de Araujo, Daniele Ribeiro [4, 1] ; de Paula, Eneida [1]
Total Authors: 8
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Biochem, Inst Biol, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Francisco, UNIFAG, Clin Pharmacol & Gastroenterol Unit, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Physiol Sci, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[4] Fed Univ ABC, Human & Nat Sci Ctr, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 4
Document type: Journal article
Source: Journal of Liposome Research; v. 21, n. 1, p. 88-94, MAR 2011.
Web of Science Citations: 16
Abstract

This blinded crossover study evaluated the efficacy and pain sensitivity evoked by a previously reported liposome-encapsulated mepivacaine formulation (Araujo et al., 2004). Thirty healthy volunteers received an intraoral injection (1.8 mL), at four different sessions, of the following formulations:2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (MVC(2%EPI)), 3% mepivacaine (MVC(3%)), and 2 and 3% liposome-encapsulated mepivacaine (MVC(2%LUV) and MVC(3%LUV)). Latency period and duration of anesthesia were assessed by an electrical pulp tester and injection discomfort by a visual analog scale (VAS). Data were analyzed with Tukey-Kramer and Friedman tests (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found regarding latency period (in minutes) among the formulations (P > 0.05). The duration of anesthesia after the injection of MVC(3%LUV) was higher than the one obtained after the infiltration of MVC(2%LUV) and of MVC(3%) (P < 0.05). However, the duration of anesthesia obtained with MVC(3%) did not differ from the one obtained with MVC(2%LUV) (P > 0.05). MVC(3%LUV) showed lower VAS median values than MVC(2%EPI) (P < 0.05), and there were no significant differences among the others formulations. Liposome-encapsulated 3% mepivacaine showed longer duration of anesthesia, in comparison to the commercial formulation of MVC(3%). MVC(2%LUV) was able to produce a similar duration of anesthesia as the 3% commercial formulation, despite the 50% decrease in the anesthetic concentration. Thus, the encapsulation of mepivacaine increased the duration of anesthesia and reduced the injection discomfort caused by vasoconstrictor-associated formulations in healthy volunteers. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 06/00121-9 - New formulations for the controlled release of local anesthetics in dentistry: from development to clinical tests
Grantee:Eneida de Paula
Support Opportunities: Research Projects - Thematic Grants