Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Detection of antibodies against bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) in dairy cattle with different prevalences of bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BoHV-1) in Sao Paulo State, Brazil

Full text
Author(s):
Affonso, Ingrid Bortolin [1] ; Gatti, Sandra Possebon [2] ; Alexandrino, Bruna [1] ; Oliveira, Monica Costa [1] ; Ramos de Medeiros, Andrea Souza [3] ; Buzinaro, Maria da Gloria [3] ; Samara, Samir Issa [3]
Total Authors: 7
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Programa Posgrad Med Vet, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista, Colegio Tecn Agr Jose Bonifacio, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Med Vet Prevent & Reprod Anim, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS; v. 32, n. 1, p. 295-299, 2011.
Web of Science Citations: 3
Abstract

Serum samples from three dairy farms classified as high (1, 78.6%), medium (2, 40.0%) and low (3, 1.6%) prevalence for bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BoHV-1) from Sao Paulo State, were collected to analyze the prevalence to the bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) by virus neutralization test. The BRSV observed prevalences for farms 1, 2, and 3 were 45.61%, 84.42%, and 54.09%, respectively. Farm 2 showed higher prevalence to BRSV (P < 0.0001) than farms 1 and 3, which were equivalent (P = 0.2291). Two risk factors, herd size and milder climate conditions, were associated to BRSV. The prevalence of BRSV in farm 1 was statistically lower than BoHV-1 prevalence (P < 0.0001). On the other side, farms 2 and 3 have prevalences of BRSV higher than of BoHV-1 (P < 0.0001 in both comparisons). We may conclude, at least for the studied farms, that BRSV and BoHV-1 did not interact and the differences observed between BRSV and BoHV-1 prevalences into each herd did not have epidemiological importance. (AU)