Cortical Bone Stress Distribution in Mandibles wit... - BV FAPESP
Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Cortical Bone Stress Distribution in Mandibles with Different Configurations Restored with Prefabricated Bar-Prosthesis Protocol: A Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Analysis

Full text
Author(s):
de Almeida, Erika Oliveira [1] ; Rocha, Eduardo Passos [1] ; Assuncao, Wirley Goncalves [1] ; Freitas Junior, Amilcar Chagas [1] ; Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [1]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba Sch Dent, BR-16015050 Aracatuba, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 1
Document type: Journal article
Source: JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY; v. 20, n. 1, p. 29-34, JAN 2011.
Web of Science Citations: 8
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate stress distribution in different horizontal mandibular arch formats restored by protocol-type prostheses using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA). Materials and Methods: A representative model (M) of a completely edentulous mandible restored with a prefabricated bar using four interforaminal implants was created using SolidWorks 2010 software (Inovart, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and analyzed by Ansys Workbench 10.0 (Swanson Analysis Inc., Houston, PA) to obtain the stress fields. Three mandibular arch sizes were considered for analysis, regular (M), small (MS), and large (ML). Three unilateral posterior loads (L) (150 N) were used: perpendicular to the prefabricated bar (L1); 30 degrees oblique in a buccolingual direction (L2); 30 degrees oblique in a lingual-buccal direction (L3). The maximum and minimum principal stresses (sigma(max), sigma(min)), the equivalent von Mises (sigma(vM)), and the maximum principal strain (sigma(max)) were obtained for type I (M. I) and type II (M. II) cortical bones. Results: Tensile stress was more evident than compression stress in type I and II bone; however, type II bone showed lower stress values. The L2 condition showed highest values for all parameters (sigma(vM), sigma(max), sigma(min), epsilon(max)). The sigma(vM) was highest for the large and small mandibular arches. Conclusion: The large arch model had a higher influence on sigma(max) values than did the other formats, mainly for type I bone. Vertical and buccolingual loads showed considerable influence on both sigma(max) and sigma(min) stresses. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 08/00209-9 - Biomechanical behavior of a mandibular class I removable partial denture distally supported by an osseointegrated implant: tridimensional analysis by finite element analysis
Grantee:Eduardo Passos Rocha
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants