Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

How wild bearded capuchin monkeys select stones and nuts to minimize the number of strikes per nut cracked

Full text
Author(s):
Fragaszy, Dorothy M. [1] ; Greenberg, Rebecca [1] ; Visalberghi, Elisabetta [2] ; Ottoni, Eduardo B. [3] ; Izar, Patricia [3] ; Liu, Qing [1]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Psychol, Athens, GA 30602 - USA
[2] CNR, Inst Sci & Technol Cognit, I-00185 Rome - Italy
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Expt Psychol, BR-05508 Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR; v. 80, n. 2, p. 205-214, AUG 2010.
Web of Science Citations: 38
Abstract

Wild bearded capuchin monkeys, Cebus libidinosus, use stone tools to crack palm nuts to obtain the kernel. In five experiments, we gave 10 monkeys from one wild group of bearded capuchins a choice of two nuts differing in resistance and size and/or two manufactured stones of the same shape, volume and composition but different mass. Monkeys consistently selected the nut that was easier to crack and the heavier stone. When choosing between two stones differing in mass by a ratio of 1.3:1, monkeys frequently touched the stones or tapped them with their fingers or with a nut. They showed these behaviours more frequently before making their first selection of a stone than afterward. These results suggest that capuchins discriminate between nuts and between stones, selecting materials that allow them to crack nuts with fewer strikes, and generate exploratory behaviours to discriminate stones of varying mass. In the final experiment, humans effectively discriminated the mass of stones using the same tapping and handling behaviours as capuchins. Capuchins explore objects in ways that allow them to perceive invariant properties (e.g. mass) of objects, enabling selection of objects for specific uses. We predict that species that use tools will generate behaviours that reveal invariant properties of objects such as mass; species that do not use tools are less likely to explore objects in this way. The precision with which individuals can judge invariant properties may differ considerably, and this also should predict prevalence of tool use across species. (C) 2010 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (AU)