Soil bulk density evaluation by conventional and nuclear methods

Author(s)

Timm, L. C. ; Reichardt, K. ; Roveratti, R. ; Oliveira, J. C. M. ; Bacchi, O. O. S. ; Pires, L. F. ^[6]

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: Australian Journal of Soil Research; v. 43, n. 1, p. 97-103, Feb. 2005.
• Field of knowledge: Agronomical Sciences - Agronomy

Abstract

Among the methods used to measure soil bulk density, the following have been prominent: paraffin sealed clod (PS), volumetric ring (VR), and the modern methods like gamma ray computed tomography (GCT) and the neutron/gamma surface gauge (SG). The objective of this work was to compare soil bulk density values obtained through these methods, with the aim of assisting researchers on the choice of the more appropriatemethod. For this, a 200-m spatial transect was chosen in an experimental area cultivated with coffee, belonging to ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. The SG readings were first taken in the field and thereafter soil samples were collected at 8 different points, spaced at 25 m, for the other methods. The lowest values of soil bulk density were obtained for the SG method (average 1.468 g/cm3) and the highest for the PS (average 1.685 g/cm3), which was similar to the GCT method (average 1.684 g/cm3). The average soil bulk density for the VR method, which has been used in soil science as a standard method, was 1.544 g/cm3. The Tukey test indicates that the PS and GCT methods do not differ significantly (P > 0.05). They do differ in comparison with VR and SG, which also do not differ among themselves. (AU)