| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Sueli Satomi Murata
[1]
;
Roberto Holland
[2]
;
Valdir de Souza
[3]
;
Eloi Dezan Junior
[4]
;
Juliana Aguiar de Grossi
;
Célio Percinoto
[6]
Total Authors: 6
|
| Affiliation: | [1] São Paulo State University. Dental School
[2] São Paulo State University. Dental School
[3] São Paulo State University. Dental School
[4] São Paulo State University. Dental School
[6] São Paulo State University. Dental School
Total Affiliations: 6
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 13, n. 3, p. 318-324, 2005-09-00. |
| Abstract | |
The problem of finding an ideal material for filling root canals of deciduous teeth has not been solved yet. This fact led to the development of an experiment to histologically analyze the periapical tissue reaction to 3 root canal filling materials. Eighty root canals of dog deciduous anterior teeth from 6 animals, 60 days old, were used in this study. After biomechanical preparation, the root canals were filled with the following materials: slowly resorbable Maisto paste, Sealer 26 with iodoform, L&C paste (calcium hydroxide with olive oil) and as a control group, canals that were prepared but not filled. At thirty days after the treatment the animals were killed and the teeth prepared for histological analysis. The materials were ranked statistically from the best to the worst as follows: a - Maisto paste, b - Sealer 26 with iodoform, c - control group, d - L&C paste. There was significant difference (p = 0.01) only when the results of the other groups were compared with the L&C paste group. It was also observed that L&C paste was not biologically compatible and that the other materials were biocompatible but their resorption was not at the same rate as that of the deciduous teeth roots. (AU) | |