| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Total Authors: 2
|
| Affiliation: | [1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Struct Engn, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Aerosp Engn & Mech, Minneapolis, MN 55455 - USA
Total Affiliations: 2
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS OF SOLIDS; v. 19, n. 5, p. 502-523, JUL 2014. |
| Web of Science Citations: | 12 |
| Abstract | |
Constitutive modeling within peridynamic theory considers the collective deformation at each time of all the material within a delta-neighborhood of any point of a peridynamic body. The assignment of the parameter delta, called the horizon, is treated as a material property. The difference displacement quotient field in this neighborhood, rather than the extension scalar field, is used to generate a three-dimensional state-based linearly elastic peridynamic theory. This yields an enhanced interpretation of the kinematics between bonds that includes both length and relative angle changes. A free energy function for a linearly elastic isotropic peridynamic material that contains four material constants is proposed as a model, and it is used to obtain the force vector state and the associated modulus state for this material. These states are analogous to, respectively, the stress field and the fourth-order elasticity tensor in classical linear theory. In the limit of small horizon, we find that only three of the four peridynamic material constants are related to the classical elastic coefficients of an isotropic linear elastic material, with one of the three constants being arbitrary. The fourth peridynamic material constant, which accounts for the coupling effect of both bond length and relative angle change, has no effect on the limit, but remains a part of the peridynamic model. The determination of the two undetermined constants is the subject of future investigation. Peridynamic models proposed elsewhere in the literature depend on the deformation state through its dilatational and deviatoric parts and contain only two peridynamic material constants, in analogy to the classical linear elasticity theory. Observe from above that our model depends on both length and relative angle changes, as in classical linear theory, but, otherwise, is not limited to having only two material constants. In addition, our model corresponds to a nonordinary material, which represents a substantial break with classical models. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 10/11969-4 - Behavior of solids in the vicinity of singular points |
| Grantee: | Adair Roberto Aguiar |
| Support Opportunities: | Scholarships abroad - Research |