Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand

Compared study of ontological commitment of classes and sets theories

Grant number: 16/10497-8
Support type:Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate (Direct)
Effective date (Start): September 01, 2016
Effective date (End): March 31, 2019
Field of knowledge:Humanities - Philosophy - Logic
Principal researcher:Walter Alexandre Carnielli
Grantee:Alfredo Roque de Oliveira Freire Filho
Home Institution: Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência (CLE). Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Campinas , SP, Brazil
Associated scholarship(s):17/21020-0 - On the conditions for a comparison of ontological commitment between theories, BE.EP.DD

Abstract

Often ZF practice includes the use of the meta-theoretical notion of classes as shorthand expressions or in order to simplify the understanding of conceptual resources. NBG theory expresses formally the internalization of this feature in set theory; in this case, classes, before used metatheoretically, will also be captured by quantifiers of the first order theory. Nevertheless there is a widespread opinion that this internalization of classes is harmless. In this context, it is common to refer to the conservativeness of NBG in relation to ZF as a sufficient condition to understand those theories as "equivalent'', attributing a sense of virtuality to the use of classes quantified in NBG. We believe, however, that a technique used to establish relationships between theories is not necessarily neutral in relation to its results - so a conservativeness established through models have different meaning and depth of that relationship established by finitary interpretations. We believe, therefore, that the way in which relationships between theories are established influences the analysis result. In the case of the relationship between NBG and ZF, since NBG is finitely axiomatizible and ZF not, we believe that we have sufficient reasons to assert that the use of different analysis tools may reveal differences such as expressiveness, ontological commitment and logical conservativeness. Therefore, this project aims to clarify the relationship between these two theories through triangulations between them and the different analysis tools. The use of finitary techniques, in this case, may prove greater expressiveness and ontological commitment of NBG in relation to ZF - relation obscured by an infinitary approach. We believe that, through this research, we can contribute to the debate on the basis of Mathematics, denaturalizing the supposedly "equivalent'' use of NBG and ZF for this purpose. (AU)

News published in Agência FAPESP Newsletter about the scholarship:
Articles published in other media outlets (0 total):
More itemsLess items
VEICULO: TITULO (DATA)
VEICULO: TITULO (DATA)

Academic Publications
(References retrieved automatically from State of São Paulo Research Institutions)
FILHO, Alfredo Roque de Oliveira Freire. Compared study of ontological commitment of class and set theories. 2019. 174 f. Doctoral Thesis - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas.

Please report errors in scientific publications list by writing to: cdi@fapesp.br.