Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Roberta Lelis Dutra
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Press: | São Paulo. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina (FM/SBD) |
| Defense date: | 2014-09-04 |
| Examining board members: |
Chong Ae Kim;
Maria Isabel de Souza Aranha Melaragno;
Thelma Suely Okay;
Ana Beatriz Alvarez Perez
|
| Advisor: | Chong Ae Kim |
| Abstract | |
INTRODUCTION: Genomic imbalances are the most common cause of miscarriage, congenital anomalies (CA) and mental retardation (MR). With the improvement of new cytogenomics diagnostic techniques, such as the MLPA (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification) and the array techniques, it have been shown that changes in the normal gene copy number influence the pathogenic variability of phenotypes in different syndromes. AIMS: The aims of the present study were to identify CNVs in patients with CM and RM using the MLPA technique and, from the abnormalities results, to apply the array methodology for the identification of complex rearrangements. Furthermore, the study aimed to associate the alterations found by molecular techniques with the phenotype of patients. METHODS: 416 patients with CM and RM participated in the study. The samples were analysed by MLPA technique with commercial kits for the main microdeletion syndromes (P064) and subtelomeric regions (P036 and P070). Two more MLPA kits for specific regions 7q11.23 (P029) and 22q11.2 (P250) were used to confirm the altered results and to complement some results with the identification of atypical abnormalities. From the patients who presented abnormalities by MLPA technique, 15 underwent by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH-array) technique, using three different platform: Agilent SurePrint G3 Human Genome microarray 180 kb, HumanCytoSNP -12 BeadChip, CytoScan(TM) HD ® and Affymetrix 6.0. RESULTS: The molecular analysis by MLPA technique allowed the detection of microdeletions and/or microduplications in 97 patients. In 46 patients it was possible to find genomic alteration using only MLPA kit P064 and in 34 patients using only the subtelomeric kits P036 and P070. For four patients it was only possible to identify the genomic abnormalities using another specific MLPA kit (P250), involving the 22q11.2 region. Complex rearrangements involving more than three chromosomes were detected in 10 patients. DISCUSSION: The MLPA technique was capable of detecting CNVs in 97/416 (23,3%) of patients, being an ideal technique to be applied in patients with non-specific signs phenotypic. Some genomic alterations found are, also related to specific changes, such as the presence of cardiac malformation or convulsions. In other cases, the high phenotypic variability may be associated to certain group of pathogenic CNVs. Moreover, the inclusion of additional screening method, with greater coverage, allowed the detection of complex rearrangements not seen before even in syndromes as well described microdeletions syndromes on 7q11.23 and 22q11.2 regions. CONCLUSION: The MLPA technique can be a valuable tool used as a molecular screening test, because it has greater coverage and lower cost of detected regions (AU) | |