Regulation of redox homeostasis and integrated stress response by Protein Disulfid...
Histopathological and Biochemical Characterization of a Knockin Mouse Line Express...
Study of FBN1 gene expression in animal models for Marfan Syndrome
![]() | |
Author(s): |
Thayna Meirelles Santos
Total Authors: 1
|
Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
Press: | São Paulo. |
Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina (FM/SBD) |
Defense date: | 2014-09-02 |
Examining board members: |
Francisco Rafael Martins Laurindo;
Hiro Goto;
Monica Valeria Marquezini;
Mario Jose Abdalla Saad;
José Xavier Neto
|
Advisor: | Francisco Rafael Martins Laurindo |
Abstract | |
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is the most common connective tissue hereditary disease, caused by mutations in the glycoprotein fibrillin-1, the main structural component of extracellular matrix elastic microfibrils. MFS phenotypic manifestations are systemic and typically involve the ocular, skeletal and cardiovascular systems, the latter a major cause of morbidity/mortality. However, how gene mutation induxes disease is yet unclear. Previous studies suggest endoplasmic reticulum (ER) morphological abnormalities or fibrillin-1 intracellular retention in advanced MFS stages. However, the contribution of mutated fibrillin-1 folding and ER stress to MFS cellular pathophysiology is unknown. Un/misfolded proteins may associate with their intracellular retention and/or increased degradation through ER-associated degradation (ERAD), in addition to inducing the unfolded protein response (UPR), both sharing potential contributions to disease pathophysiology, including MFS. Thus, we studied in embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) isolated from WT and MFS mice, if mutated fibrillin-1 can be recognized by ER quality control as a misfolded protein, able to induce ER stress due to its intracellular retention. We showed that fibrillin-1 mutation by itself did not promote UPR chaperone markers or oxidant generation. Moreover, it did not sensitize cells to exogenous ER stress nor affected cell survival curves after proteasome inhibition. Furthermore, no intracellular retention of fibrillin-1 was observed in MFS cells, and even after secretory pathway inhibition or ER stress induction, fibrillin-1 secretion inhibition was similar in MFS and wild-type (WT) MEFs. Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), an important ER redox chaperone, interacts with fibrillin-1 and its silencing induced an increased fibrillin-1 secretion in WT, but not MFS MEFs. Besides, PDI silencing promoted fibrillin-1 extracellular matrix disorganization in WT MEFs, whereas in MFS MEFs, the basal matrix disorganization was not further modified. Parallel in vivo evaluations demonstrated that ER stress is also not induced in 1 and 3 month-old mice MFS, despite evident phenotypical manifestations. However, concomitant to accelerated disease progression at 6 months, ER stress was detectable in ascendant aorta, but not in other disease-affected or unaffected organs. Thus, classic MFS phenotype manifestations do not require loss of ER homeostasis directly induced by mutated fibrillin-1. Contrarily, the latter can evade a PDI-mediated quality control mechanism to be normally secreted. Therefore, evading such PDI-mediated quality control is an essential permissive condition for enabling the MFS phenotype. On the other hand, ER stress is an evolutive feature of MFS ascendant aorta aneurysm concomitant to phenotype progression in this tissue (AU) |