Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Comparative analysis of velopharyngeal activity assessed by acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and videofluoroscopy

Full text
Author(s):
Alicia Graziela Noronha Silva
Total Authors: 1
Document type: Master's Dissertation
Press: Bauru.
Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru (FOB/SDB)
Defense date:
Examining board members:
Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade; Giedre Berretin Felix; Cristina Guedes de Azevedo Bento Gonçalves
Advisor: Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade
Abstract

Objective: To analyze velopharyngeal (VP) activity of subjects with VP dysfunction (VPD) by acoustic rhinometry (AR), as compared to rhinomanometry (RM) and videofluoroscopy (VF). Method: Prospective clinical study in 41 adults, both sexes, with repaired cleft palate±lip and residual VPD on clinical assessment. Variables analyzed: 1) AR (n=41): nasopharyngeal volumetric change (V) during the production of plosives [k], [p], [t], relatively to rest condition (reduction <3cm3 considered as absence of VP activity). 2) RM (n=41): VP orifice area (area > 0,05cm2 considered as inadequate closure), 3) VF (n=9): velar gap and pharyngeal walls movement (gap >2mm and mobility <50% considered as inadequate). The plosive [p] was used when comparing the three techniques. Results: A mean V decrease of 18% was observed during the production of [k], which was significantly lower (p<0.05) than the decrease reported for normals (30%). V values suggestive of VPD were observed in 59% of the subjects analyzed. Similar results were obtained for [p] and [t]. On RM, 85% of the subjects had inadequate closure; V did not vary according to the degree of closure. On VF, a significant gap was observed in 89%; the tongue did not contributed to VP closure. Agreement between techniques was of 51% (AR vs RM), 44% (AR vs VF) and 89% (RM vs VF). Conclusion: Acoustic rhinometry had no good accuracy as a diagnostic method of VPD, when compared to the two gold-standard methods used. Nevertheless, the technique showed potential as a method for monitoring the outcomes of clinical and surgical treatment of VPD. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 13/15089-7 - Comparative analysis of velopharyngeal activity assessed by acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and videofluoroscopy
Grantee:Alicia Graziela Noronha Silva Salgueiro
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Master