Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Validation of nociceptive methods electrical, mechanical and thermal pain assessment of horses treated eith methadone associated with detomidine or acepromazine

Full text
Author(s):
Carlize Lopes
Total Authors: 1
Document type: Doctoral Thesis
Press: Botucatu. 2015-05-14.
Institution: Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp). Faculdade de Medicina. Botucatu
Defense date:
Advisor: Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
Abstract

Recognition of pain is fundamental for the development of effective analgesic strategies, therefore, it is essential to develop valid and reliable instruments for assessment of pain. A valid instrument to recognize the pain should produce sensitive scores, which should be modified after the administration of analgesics and should not result in tissue damage, should be easy to apply, with a clear cut-off and present validity and reproducibility. This study aimed to compare the electrical, mechanical and thermal nociceptive stimuli and investigate their feasibility, repeatability, sensitivity and specificity in eight horses. In the second part of the study, the antinociceptive effects of intravenous administration of methadone combined with detomidine or acepromazine were evaluated in the same animals. The mechanical (M) and thermal in the limb (TL) stimuli were measured at the left and right metacarpus regions, respectively. The electrical stimulus (E) was measured at the left coronary band and thorax thermal stimulus (TT) in the thorax, caudal to the withers. In part 1 of the study, three real and one sham stimuli were randomly applied, for each of the four tests, giving a total of 32 stimulations/animal in each phase, repeated six months later. In the part 2 of the study, the horses were treated with saline (C), methadone (0,2 mg/kg) combined with detomidine (10 μg/kg) - MD or acepromazine (0,05 mg/kg), with a minimum of one week interval. Thresholds were measured before and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 and 150 minutes after treatment. The agreement between observers measured by kappa coefficient was 90% for both phases grouped and 92% and 88% in phases 1 and 2, respectively. The M stimulus showed 100% agreement between observers, followed by TL (97%), E (84%) and TT (75%). Sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 92%, respectively. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to compare differences ... (AU)

FAPESP's process: 11/21927-0 - Validation of electrical, mechanical and thermal nociceptive methods for pain assessment in horses treated with methadone associated with detomidine or acepromazine
Grantee:Carlize Lopes
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate