Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


The minimum length corridor problem: exact, approximative and heuristic algorithms

Full text
Author(s):
Lucas de Oliveira
Total Authors: 1
Document type: Master's Dissertation
Press: Campinas, SP.
Institution: Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Instituto de Computação
Defense date:
Examining board members:
Cid Carvalho de Souza; Carlos Eduardo Ferreira; Pedro Jussieu de Rezende
Advisor: Cid Carvalho de Souza
Abstract

This dissertation focuses on the experimental investigation of exact, approximation and heuristic algorithms applied to solve the so-called minimum length corridor problem (MLCP). In the MLCP we receive a rectilinear polygon P and a set of minor rectilinear polygons forming a connected planar subdivision S of P. A solution for this problem, also called corridor, is formed by a set of connected edges of S, and such that each inner face of S has at least one point on its your border which belongs to an edge in this set. The goal is to find a corridor such that the sum of lengths of the edges is as small as possible. This is an NP-hard problem with applications in several areas such as telecommunications, civil engineering and design of VLSI circuits. The MLCP can be polynomially reduced to a graph problem known as group Steiner tree problem (GSTP). Based on this transformation, we studied and implemented two approximation methods, an exact branch-and-cut method, and a heuristic method based on the metaheuristic GRASP combined with an evolutionary path relinking (GRASP+EPR). Furthermore, we propose three local search heuristics to improve the quality of GSTP solutions. MLCP instances were randomly generated, in which we apply the methods implemented. We analyzed the results, and present situations where it is interesting to use each method. We found that the branch-and-cut has been able to find optimal solutions for instances that we consider to be large in acceptable computational times. The best approximation algorithm obtained corridors having average length 17% higher than the optimum length. If we combine this algorithm with the improvement heuristics proposed this percentage drops to an average of 3.5%. Finally, the GRASP+EPR spent more time than this approximation algorithm, however, the length of the corridors obtained by the method is, on average, 0.9% higher than the optimum length (AU)

FAPESP's process: 10/06720-7 - The minimum weight corridor problem: exact algorithms and heuristics
Grantee:Lucas de Oliveira
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Master