Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Elisabete Maria Mellace
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Master's Dissertation |
| Press: | Piracicaba. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALA/BC) |
| Defense date: | 2009-06-17 |
| Examining board members: |
Iran José Oliveira da Silva;
Gerson Barreto Mourão;
Evaldo Antonio Lencioni Titto
|
| Advisor: | Iran José Oliveira da Silva |
| Abstract | |
This study had as objective to evaluate and quantify the effect of artificial shading proportioned by different shadow areas under physiology and behavior of milk heifers, in pastures. Research was realized in the period from February to April, 2008. Experimental area was divided in 20 adjacent parcels with 84m2 to treatments 1, 2 and 3 and with 70m2 to treatments 4 and 5. Were compared witness (treatment 1, no shadow) with 4 shading areas per animal, treatment 2 (with 1,5 m²), treatment 3 (3,0 m²), treatment 4 (5,0 m²) and treatment 5 (8,0 m²). Shelters dimensions were 1,0m x 1,5m x 3,5m (width, length and height) (1,5m² of shade.animal-1), 1,5m x 2,0m x 3,5m (3,0m² of shade.animal-1), 2,0m x 2,5m x 3,5m (5,0m² of shade.animal-1) and 2,0m x 4,0m x 3,5m (8,0m² of shade.animal-1), without walls in the sides. Twenty crossbred heifers were used, 3/4 Jersey, ½ Holstein and pure Jersey and Holstein, with ages among 12 and 25 months and average weight varying from 240 to 360 kg, paired in function of weight and age uniformity. Heifers remained in Penissetum purpureum paddocks and had a diet complementation in the trough, during the period of night and after 8:00am they were conducted to the parcels. Tgn was registered by a minidatalogger from LOGEN LS 8856 ALPAX trend. Meteorological variables were obtained in the agrometeorological post from ESALQ/USP. During nine non consecutive days were registered FR and TS. Behavioral observations were realized in non consecutive days (nine days) in the period from 10:00am to 16:00pm by the focal method. 66,7% of environmental conditions in the period of research were in thermal stress conditions to the heifers. Values of FR and TS were minor under the major area of (P<0,05) and similar among 1,5m², 3,5m² and 5,0m² (P>0,05). There was a correlation of Tgn with FR and TS. Behavioral alterations among the treatments were not observed, animals stayed under the shadow in the hotter hours of the day, preferably on foot, behavior followed the known patters to bovine. For milk heifers the better of artificial shading area is 3m². (AU) | |