Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Larissa Forni dos Santos
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Master's Dissertation |
| Press: | Ribeirão Preto. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (PCARP/BC) |
| Defense date: | 2012-10-05 |
| Examining board members: |
Flavia de Lima Osorio;
Carlos Henrique Sancineto da Silva Nunes;
Antonio Waldo Zuardi
|
| Advisor: | Flavia de Lima Osorio |
| Abstract | |
Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is characterized by the sharp or persistent fear of situations in which the individual could feel shame, leading to a behavior of phobic avoidance. However, it is still little diagnosed, due to the difficulty in recognizing its characteristics as symptoms. Therefore, the validation of instruments to screening SAD is highly important to help in the diagnosis and treatment. Among the instruments available in the literature, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) has been the most used worldwide, being in clinical or of research situations. However, in the Brazilian context the use of this instrument has not been consistently validated. Thus, the objective of this study is to verify the psychometric qualities of validity (convergent, divergent and discriminant) and reliability of LSAS-SR, translated into Portuguese, in its self-reported version, in a sample of university students from the general population (N = 413) and in a clinical sample of SAD (N = 252). For this purpose, data from university students of two institutions of the interior of the state of São Paulo were collected. They used instruments for specific evaluation of SAD and of their subtypes and others for evaluation of constructs correlated to SAD, such as general anxiety, functional impairment, depression and alcohol abuse in addition to LSAR-SR and an identification questionnaire. LSAS-SR showed excellent internal consistency (=0.90-0.96). The convergent validity with specific scales for the SAD assessment presented correlations that ranged from 0.33 to 0.84. With the scale that evaluates specific aspects of the SAD (to speak in public) the correlations were weak and insignificant and with the general scale of anxiety these values ranged from 0.21 to 0.57, being classified as weak to moderate. It presented moderate correlations, in most cases, with correlated constructs, such as depression (0.36 0.52) and functional impairment (0.30 0.72). It was also observed adequate capacity of discrimination of the scale concerning the differentiation between cases and non-cases (S=0.96, E=0.80). Initially, the exploratory factorial analysis pointed the solution of 12 factors. The models with three, four and five factors were tested too, howsoever they were composed of clusters of different items compared with the original studies. The confirmatory factorial analysis did not replicate previous findings, signaling, as found in the literature, the difficulty in getting a factorial structure of consensus, common to several cultures where the instrument was studied. For the evaluation of test-retest reliability the Interclass Correlation (0.81) and the Pearson (0.82) Coefficients were calculated. Both demonstrated to be satisfactory. The present findings are aligned with international studies that certify the excellent psychometric qualities of LSAS-SR. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 10/12736-3 - STUDY OF VALIDITY AND REALIBILITY OF LIEBOWITZ SOCIAL ANXIETY SCALE - SELF-VERSION |
| Grantee: | Larissa Forni dos Santos |
| Support Opportunities: | Scholarships in Brazil - Master |