Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Fernanda de Paula Eduardo
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Press: | São Paulo. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Odontologia (FO/SDO) |
| Defense date: | 2006-05-09 |
| Examining board members: |
Marcia Martins Marques;
Vanderlei Salvador Bagnato;
Dolores Ursula Mehnert;
Norberto Nobuo Sugaya;
Denise Maria Zezell
|
| Advisor: | Marcia Martins Marques |
| Abstract | |
Purpose: The clinical effects attributed to phototherapy relative to Herpes simplex lesions have included prevention of lesion formation, speeding the healing of lesions, and decreasing the frequency of recurrent lesions. The mechanisms underlying these findings have not been established yet. The aim of this in vitro study was to analyze the effect of phototherapy on epithelial cells, on HSV-1, and on infected epithelial cells in culture. Material and Methods: Cultures of HSV-1 and infected or non-infected monkey epithelial cells (Vero cell line) grown in deficient media (2 % fetal bovine serum-fbs) were used. The laser irradiation was delivered using a GaAlAs laser (660 and 780 nm, focal spot of 3.6 mm2). One, two and three irradiations with 6 hourintervals were done. The experimental groups were: Control: non-irradiated; 660 nm/3 J/cm2 (28 sec); 660 nm/5 J/cm2 (38 sec); 780 nm/3 J/cm2 (19 sec), and 780 nm/5 J/cm2 (25 sec). The HSV-1 cytopatic effects and the cell viability of irradiated cultures and controls were analyzed in four different conditions: 1) irradiation of noninfected epithelial cells; 2) epithelial cells irradiated prior infection; 3) virus irradiated prior infection; and 4) irradiation of HSV-1 infected cells. The cell viability was assessed by the reduction of the MTT test and the cytopatic effects by the light microscopy observation. Results: The cell viability of irradiated cultures grown in nutritional deficit, independently of the irradiation numbers, was always significantly smaller than that of non-irradiated cultures grown at the ideal serum concentration condition (10 %). The cell viability of non-infected cells was similar amongst the groups. The number of irradiations influenced the cell growth positively and proportionally to the number of irradiations, except for the 660 nm/3J/cm2 group. Any variation in cytopatic effects was observed amongst the experimental groups, independently of the irradiation numbers at the 3 conditions analyzed. The cell viability of all experimental groups were not altered either by irradiation of the cells or of the virus prior infection. The viability of infected cells prior irradiation was significantly higher than that of non-irradiated cultures when 2 irradiations were done. Conclusion: The experimental conditions for this study demonstrate that the phototherapy is capable of enhancing the growth of Vero cells grown under nutritional deficit conditions, however, not enough to reach the characteristic cell growth of cells grown at the ideal serum concentration condition. The number of irradiations influences the cell growth positive and proportionally, except when the parameter 660 nm and 3 J/cm2 was used. The laser radiation does not change either the susceptibility of the Vero cell to the HSV-1 infection or the HSV-1 virulence; however, prolongs the cell viability of HSV-1 infected cells. Positive benefits of phototherapy that have been reported clinically would appear to be due to host effects unrelated to viral replication in infected cells. (AU) | |