Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Effect of landscape context at different scales on the distribution of small mammals in areas of agriculture and in forest remnants

Full text
Author(s):
Fabiana Umetsu
Total Authors: 1
Document type: Doctoral Thesis
Press: São Paulo.
Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Instituto de Biociências (IBIOC/SB)
Defense date:
Examining board members:
Renata Pardini; Ana Paula Carmignotto; Jean Paul Walter Metzger; Paulo Inácio de Knegt López de Prado; Marcus Vinícius Vieira
Advisor: Renata Pardini
Abstract

This study focused on the importance of the context of altered habitats in the neighborhoods to the distribution of different groups of species of non-flying small mammals in fragmented landscapes of the Atlantic forest. In the first approach (chapter 2), using the distribution of small mammals in forest remnants and in the four main altered habitats in an Atlantic forest landscape, we investigated 1) how explanatory power of models describing species distribution in forest remnants varies between landscape structure variables that do or do not incorporate matrix quality and 2) the importance of spatial scale for analyzing the influence of landscape structure. We used standardized sampling in remnants and altered habitats to generate two indices of habitat quality, corresponding to the abundance and to the occurrence of small mammals. For each remnant, we calculated habitat quantity and connectivity in different spatial scales, considering or not the quality of surrounding habitats. The incorporation of matrix quality increased model explanatory power across all spatial scales for half the species that occurred in the matrix, but only when taking into account the distance between habitat patches (connectivity). Results indicate the importance of the matrix for the dynamics of fragmented landscapes and suggest that relatively simple indices can improve our understanding of species distribution, and could be applied in modeling, monitoring and managing complex tropical landscapes. In the second approach, (chapter 3), we aimed at testing two hypotheses related to the importance of landscape context to the biological diversity found in areas of agriculture using Atlantic forest small mammals as a model: (1) that the context in which the areas of agriculture are inserted, in particular the quantity of remnant forests, determines the assemblage of small mammals found in those productive areas; (2) that those responses to the context are scale-dependent, being observed at larger spatial scales. To accomplish that, we sampled 36 sites in areas of agriculture in two fragmented Atlantic forest landscapes presenting different proportions of native forest remnants, which were selected aiming at including the widest variation in quantity and aggregation of open anthropogenic areas in the local neighborhood. We built and compared 12 candidate models which differed in relation to the contribution of the effects of context at large and local spatial scales, including all possible combinations between these variables, the interaction of the variables measured at different scales, and the null model. According to our initial expectations, the species that are restricted to forest biomes were the commonest and best-distributed ones, in areas of agriculture surrounded by higher quantities of forest at the large scale. However, the invasive species and the species that are not restricted to forest biomes dominated the areas of agriculture in the two studied landscapes, independently from the quantity of remnant forest at the large scale, and they responded mainly, but in the opposite way, to the context at smaller scales. The results indicate that: (1) the differential response between the groups of species is conditioned by differences in habitat requirements between them; (2) the maintenance of more demanding species in agricultural lands depends on management strategies which consider the landscape scale; (3) even areas of conventional agriculture can be important to the connectivity of the landscape for the most demanding species, as far as they are inserted in a context of higher quantities of remnant forest; (4) the control of the populations of invasive species that can act as reservoirs of pathogens that cause disease in men, and that can be pests in agriculture, depends on the management at local scale, at least in landscapes where the areas of agriculture predominate. (AU)