Study of the IGF-IGFBPs in HIV-positive children: correlation with growth
IGF-I, IGF-II and IGFBPs in children with subclinical hypothyroidism
Impact of gestational and lactational protein restriction on rat prostate: relatio...
![]() | |
Author(s): |
Luciana Ribeiro Montenegro
Total Authors: 1
|
Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
Press: | São Paulo. |
Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina (FM/SBD) |
Defense date: | 2009-05-22 |
Examining board members: |
Alexander Augusto de Lima Jorge;
Sonir Roberto Rauber Antonini;
Maria Lucia Cardillo Correa Giannella;
Cristiane Kochi;
Mirian Yumie Nishi
|
Advisor: | Alexander Augusto de Lima Jorge |
Abstract | |
Introduction: Children born small for gestational age (SGA) have a higher risk of staying with short stature in adulthood. The insulin-like growth factors (IGF-1 and IGF-2) are the main endocrine factor determining fetal growth. Most of the known actions of IGFs are mediated by IGF-1R, a tyrosine kinase receptor. Recently, the IGF-1 insensitivity was identified causing growth retardation in children born SGA who who did not present spontaneous catch-up growth in postnatal life. Affected children had elevated IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels in addition to microcephaly. The role of post receptor defects in IGF-1 signaling on the deficit of growth is still unclear. Objective: To assess IGF-1 action and signaling in vitro in fibroblasts from SGA children. Methods: Fibroblasts cell cultures were developed from 2 controls (C1 and C2) and 4 patients with pre- and post-natal growth retardation (SGA1, SGA2, SGA3 and SGA4). IGF-1 insensitivity was demonstrated by severe pre and postnatal growth impairment without any evident cause, IGF1 SDS > 0 and poor growth response during high doses of hGH treatment. Three SGA patients presented microcephaly. Defects in the gene of the IGF1 and IGF1R were excluded by direct sequencing. One patient (SGA1) presents the Silver- Russell syndrome (SRS) with loss of methylation of the paternal allele in the ICR1 (imprinting center region 1) chromosome 11p15, important for IGF-2 expression. IGF-1 action was assessed by cell proliferation by colorimetric assay. IGF-1 signaling was assessed by AKT and ERK phosphorylation after IGF-1 stimulation through SDS-PAGE of intracellular extract followed by immunoblotting with specific antibodies. The expression of IGF1R and IGFBP3 gene was determined by Real-time quantitative PCR and the levels of the IGF-1R and IGBP-3 protein by direct immunoblotting. Results: The SGA1, SGA2 and SGA3 cell lines proliferated 31%, 60% and 78% less under IGF-1 stimulation in comparison of controls fibroblasts, respectively. The expression of IGF1R mRNA and the level of total amount of IGF-1R protein were similar in all SGA and control cell lines. Despite normal IGF-1R structure and quantity, the same 3 SGA cell lines that presented low proliferation response also had 50 to 85% lower ERK phosphorylation after IGF-1 treatment (p <0.001), although the similar total content of ERK1/2. In relation to PI3K pathway activation, all SGA cell cultures presented normal AKT phosphorilation. Fibroblasts from the SGA1 patient presented a 14x increase in IGFBP3 mRNA and 2x more IGFBP-3 secretion to culture serum medium. Treatment with desIGF-1, an IGF-1 analogue with low affinity for IGFBPs although retains its ability to activate the IGF-1R, did not recover cell proliferation or ERK phosphorylation. All cell lines presented similar amount of GRB10 protein Conclusion: Three of 4 SGA patients showed evidence of post-receptor IGF-1 insensitivity. The cell line SGA1, obtained from a SRS patient with ICR1 hypomethylation, showed increased expression and secretion of IGFBP-3, which was not directly responsible for inhibition in IGF- 1 action. Further studies should be developed to identify the molecular cause of IGF-1 post-receptor insensitivity observed in our patients. (AU) |