Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Microbiological, physical and mechanical evaluation of resilient materials modified by the addition of antimicrobial agents for denture stomatitis\' treatment

Full text
Author(s):
Mírian Galvão Bueno
Total Authors: 1
Document type: Master's Dissertation
Press: Bauru.
Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru (FOB/SDB)
Defense date:
Examining board members:
Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek; Marcelo Ferraz Mesquita; Vinícius Carvalho Porto
Advisor: Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial action on Candida albicans biofilm (SC5314) and determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of five drugs for denture stomatitis\' treatment (nystatin, miconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, and chlorhexidine diacetate) incorporated into temporary denture relines (Trusoft e Softone) as well the effect of this addition on the Shore A hardness and surface roughness of the materials. For MIC determination, the fungal biofilm was formed on disc specimens (10mm x 1 mm) of the materials (n= 6) modified (experimental) or not (control) by the addition of drugs. Different dosages of the antimicrobials were tested and cellular viability was determined by spectrophotometric tetrazolium salt XTT reduction assay at 24 h, 48 h, 7 and 14 days of incubation. The spectrophotometric measurements were converted to percentage reduction in candidal growth and the MICs were determined as the concentrations necessary to inhibit 90% or more of fungal viability. For hardness and surface tests, rectangular specimens (36 mm X 7 mm X 6 mm) of the resilient materials (n= 8) were made without (control) or with incorporation of the MIC drugs. After storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24h, 7 and 14 days, the hardness tests were performed using a Shore A hardness tester (Woltest, GSD-709A) and the roughness assay was conducted in a surface roughness tester (Surftest SJ-301). Data were statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA followed by Tukeys test (=.05). According to the results, MICs of the drugs incorporated into the material were: 0.032, 0.256, 0.128, 0.256 e 0.064 g/mL for nystatin, miconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole and chlorhexidine, respectively. The addition of the tested antimicrobial agents in both materials demonstrated no evident hardness change or resulted in its decrease compared to the control, except for miconazole incorporation into Softone, which increased the hardness values after 14 days (P = .0035). The addition of nystatin into the two materials, chlorhexidine into Trusoft and ketoconazole into Softone resulted in no significant changes of roughness values compared to the control after 7 and 14 days (P>.05). In these periods, itraconazole promoted increase of the roughness for both materials (P<.0001). Compare to the 24- h period, the roughness at 14- day time with the addition of nystatin, miconazole and ketoconazole was reduced for Trusoft (P<.05) and remained unaffected for Softone (P> .05). It can be concluded that the incorporation of antimicrobial agents inhibited the C. albicans growth on the materials up to 14 days. The addition of all tested drugs, except for the miconazole into Softone, resulted in no deleterious effects on hardness of the resilient materials over the evaluation time. At the end period, the incorporation of nystatin, miconazole and ketoconazole into both denture relines and chlorhexidine into Trusoft resulted in no detrimental changes on the roughness. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 09/04890-5 - Microbiological, physical and mechanical evaluation of resilient materials modified by the addition of antimicrobial agents for denture stomatitis treatment
Grantee:Mírian Galvão Bueno
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Master