Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Sleep and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes

Full text
Author(s):
Ugliara Barone, Mark Thomaz [1, 2] ; Wey, Daniela [3] ; Schorr, Fabiola [4] ; Franco, Denise Reis [2, 5] ; Carra, Mario Kehdi [6] ; Lorenzi-Filho, Geraldo [4] ; Menna-Barreto, Luiz [7]
Total Authors: 7
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Ciencias Biomed, BR-05508900 Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[2] Assoc Diabet Juvenil ADJ Diabet Brasil, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publ, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Inst Coracao, InCor FMUSP, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[5] Ctr Pesquisas Clin CPClin, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[6] Hosp Clin Sao Paulo, FMUSP, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[7] Univ Sao Paulo, EACH, BR-09500900 Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 7
Document type: Journal article
Source: Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia e Metabologia; v. 59, n. 1, p. 71-78, FEB 2015.
Web of Science Citations: 13
Abstract

Objective: Our aim in the present study was to elucidate how type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and sleep parameters interact, which was rarely evaluated up to the moment. Materials and methods: Eighteen T1DM subjects without chronic complications, and 9 control subjects, matched for age and BMI, were studied. The following instruments used to evaluate sleep: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, sleep diaries, actimeters, and polysomnography in a Sleep Lab. Glycemic control in T1DM individuals was evaluated through: A1C, home fingertip glucometer for 10 days (concomitant with the sleep diary and actimeter), and CGM or concomitant with continuous glucose monitoring (during the polysomnography night). Results: Comparing with the control group, individuals with diabetes presented more pronounced sleep extension from weekdays to weekends than control subjects (p = 0.0303). Among T1DM, glycemic variability (SD) was positively correlated with sleep latency (r = 0.6525, p = 0.0033); full awakening index and arousal index were positively correlated with A1C (r = 0.6544, p = 0.0081; and r = 0.5680, p = 0.0272, respectively); and mean glycemia values were negatively correlated with sleep quality in T1DM individuals with better glycemic control (mean glycemia < 154 mg/dL). Conclusion: Our results support the hypothesis of an interaction between sleep parameters and T1DM, where the glycemic control plays an important role. More studies are needed to unveil the mechanisms behind this interaction, which may allow, in the future, clinicians and educators to consider sleep in the effort of regulating glycemic control. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 08/11026-2 - Sleep / wake cycle in diabetes mellitus type 1 subjects
Grantee:Luiz Silveira Menna Barreto
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants