Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Patents in nanotechnology: an analysis using macro-indicators and forecasting curves

Full text
Author(s):
Milanez, Douglas Henrique [1] ; Lopes de Faria, Leandro Innocentini [1] ; do Amaral, Roniberto Morato [1] ; Leiva, Daniel Rodrigo [2] ; Rodrigues Gregolin, Jose Angelo [1]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Ctr Technol Informat Mat, Dept Mat Engn, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Mat Engn, Lab Amorphous & Nanocrystalline Met, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: SCIENTOMETRICS; v. 101, n. 2, p. 1097-1112, NOV 2014.
Web of Science Citations: 11
Abstract

In this study, we evaluated future trends of worldwide patenting in nanotechnology and its domains using logistic growth curves while the patent activity from the main countries, technological domains and subdomains were assessed in four different contexts: worldwide, patents filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and patents applications in the triadic (TRIAD) and in the tetradic (TETRAD) countries. The indicators were developed based on a set of records recovered from the Derwent Innovation Index database. Nanotechnology has recently emerged as a new research field, with logistic trend behaviors generating interesting discussions since they suggest that technological development in nanotechnology and its domains has reached an initial maturation stage. Future scenarios were compiled due to the difficult to establish upper limits to forecasting curves. Although China's share of patents is small in some cases, it was the only country to constantly increase the number of patents from a worldwide perspective. In contrast, the USA and the EU were the most active in the USPTO, TRIAD and TETRAD cases, followed by Japan and Korea. The technological subdomains of main interest from countries/region changed according to the perspective adopted, even though there was a clear bias towards semiconductors, surface treatments, electrical components, macromolecular chemistry, materials-metallurgy, pharmacy-cosmetics and analysis-measurement-control subdomains. We conclude that monitoring nanotechnology advances should be constantly reviewed in order to confirm the evidence observed and forecasted. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 12/16573-7 - Development of science and technology indicators for technological monitoring of advances in nanocelulose
Grantee:Douglas Henrique Milanez
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate