Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Does supplementation during previous phase influence performance during the growing and finishing phase in Nellore cattle?

Full text
Author(s):
Roth, M. T. P. [1] ; Resende, F. D. [2, 3] ; Oliveira, I. M. [3] ; Fernandes, R. M. [2] ; Custodio, L. [2] ; Siqueira, G. R. [2, 3]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] UNIFEB Ctr Univ Fdn Educ Barretos, BR-14783226 Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, BR-14884900 Sao Paulo - Brazil
[3] APTA, BR-14770000 Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: LIVESTOCK SCIENCE; v. 204, p. 122-128, OCT 2017.
Web of Science Citations: 2
Abstract

In Brazil, the beef cattle are widely raised in pasture post weaning, but the supplementation has been studied only in individual phases of the animal's growth curve. Therefore, the objective of this study was evaluated the nutritional interrelationship between the growing and finishing phases in the performance of Nellore bulls. Eighty-four weaned calves (body weight {[}13W] = 205 +/- 4.7 kg; 8 months) raised on pasture during the growing phase (dry season, summer and autumn) and finished in feedlot were used. The experiment was conducted as a randomized block design with a 2 x 2 x 3 factorial arrangement of treatments. Factors included 1) two supplements levels in the dry season (protein {[}1 g/kg BW/day - PR1] or protein-energy {[}3 g/kg BW/day - PE] supplement); 2) two supplement levels in summer (mineral supplement {[}ad libitum - MS] or protein supplement {[}1 g/kg BW/day - PR2]); and three supplement levels in autumn (MS, PR2 or PE). The animals were finished with a common diet. The dry season supplementation affected the average daily gain (ADG) in the summer (P < 0.05). In summer, animals fed MS had a greater ADG when fed PR1 in the previous (dry) season than those receiving PE (0.696 vs. 0.581 kg, P < 0.01); while, no difference in ADG was observed when the animals received PR2 (0.815 kg, P = 0.99). In autumn, animals fed PR2 in the previous (summer) season exhibited 11.3% lower ADG than those supplemented with MS (0.503 vs. 0.567 kg, P < 0.01), regardless of the autumn supplementation. Dry season supplementation did not affect the ADG during finishing phase (0.909 kg, P = 0.14). The animals fed PR2 in the summer and PE in the autumn had tendency of lower ADG during the feedlot (P = 0.06) compared with animals fed MS, however, they were finished 20 days earlier (P = 0.06). In conclusion, to provide PE in the dry season, followed by MS in the summer is not recommended, because this strategy reduces the ADG. In addition, dry season supplementation does not affect the ADG during finishing phase, while supply supplements of greater nutritional value in autumn reduces feedlot period. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 11/02937-4 - Feeding strategies in the growing and finishing Nellore cattle
Grantee:Flávio Dutra de Resende
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants
FAPESP's process: 16/01961-2 - Meta-analysis of different nutritional plans during the post-weaning phase and its impact on the finishing of beef cattle in tropical regions
Grantee:Ivanna Moraes de Oliveira
Support Opportunities: Scholarships abroad - Research Internship - Post-doctor