Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Genomic identification of microbial species adhering to maxillofacial prostheses and susceptibility to different hygiene protocols

Full text
Author(s):
Pinheiro, Juliana Barchelli [1] ; Vomero, Marina Peris [1] ; do Nascimento, Cassio [1] ; Watanabe, Evandro [2] ; Oliveira Paranhos, Helena de Freitas [1] ; Coto, Neide Pena [3] ; Dias, Reinaldo Brito [3] ; de Oliveira, Viviane Cassia [1] ; Silva-Lovato, Claudia Helena [1]
Total Authors: 9
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Dent Mat & Prostheses, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Sao Paulo, Dept Maxillofacial Surg Prostheses & Traumatol, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: BIOFOULING; v. 34, n. 1, p. 15-25, 2018.
Web of Science Citations: 1
Abstract

This study investigated the microbial colonization of maxillofacial prostheses and support tissues using the Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method, and the efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, 10% Ricinus communis solutions, or brushing, on colony forming unit (CFU) reduction in monospecies biofilms (Candida glabrata, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) formed on two silicones (MDX 4-4210 and Bio-Skin). Biofilm was harvested from 43 maxillofacial prosthesis wearers for detection of 38 species of microorganisms. The CFU counts of the six above mentioned species were recorded after using the hygiene protocols. All 38 investigated species were identified in prostheses and tissues, with a higher prevalence in the prostheses. 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate immersion showed the greatest antimicrobial effectiveness, followed by mechanical brushing protocols. MDX 4-4210 silicone produced lower CFU counts than Bio-Skin. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 12/24853-0 - Identification of the microbiota of facial prostheses and laboratory evaluation of the effectiveness of different hygiene solutions.
Grantee:Juliana Barchelli Pinheiro
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate