Kohara, Eduardo K.
Abdala, Camilla G.
Novaes, Tatiane F.
Braga, Mariana M.
Haddad, Ana E.
Mendes, Fausto M.
Total Authors: 6
 Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
 Univ Guarulhos, Sch Dent, Guarulhos, SP - Brazil
 Cruzeiro do Sul Univ, Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
 Univ Sao Paulo, Teledent & Telehlth Ctr, Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 4
SEP 6 2018.
Web of Science Citations:
The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of two different models of smart phone and a conventional camera with that of direct clinical examination in detecting caries lesions at different stages of progression in deciduous molars. The photographic equipment consisted of two smartphones (iPhone and Nexus 4) and a conventional macro camera setup. First, in the laboratory phase of the study, we compared the images of 20 exfoliated primary teeth having caries lesions at different stages. Then, in the clinical phase of the study, the images of 119 primary molars from fifteen children (3 to 6 years old) were used. All of the photographic images were taken using the previously described devices. In both groups, two examiners, blinded to the photographic equipment used, assessed the images independently on a computer screen, and classified them according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The teeth were then examined directly by two other experienced examiners, and the consensus reached was considered the reference standard. Parameters of validity, such as percentage of correct answers, agreement with the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity and inter-examiner agreement (using the weighted kappa test) were calculated. The examiners performed similarly in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Inter-examiner reliability was approximately 0.7 for all the devices in the laboratory setting, and for the macro camera photography system in the clinical setting, but it was approximately 0.9 for the iPhone and Nexus images taken in vivo. With regard to the percentage of correct answers, the highest values were observed for sound and extensive caries lesions in both laboratory and clinical settings. The percentage of correct answers for initial and moderate lesions was particularly low in the clinical evaluation, irrespective of the camera devices used. Therefore, we concluded that photographic diagnosis using smart phone images is feasible and accurate for distinguishing sound tooth surfaces from extensive caries lesions; however, photographic images are not a good method for accurately detecting initial and moderate caries lesions. (AU)