Seabird colonies as relevant sources of pollutants... - BV FAPESP
Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Seabird colonies as relevant sources of pollutants in Antarctic ecosystems: Part 2-Persistent Organic Pollutants

Full text
Author(s):
Cipro, C. V. Z. [1, 2] ; Bustamante, P. [1] ; Taniguchi, S. [2] ; Silva, J. [2] ; Petry, M. V. [3] ; Montone, R. C. [2]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] Univ La Rochelle, CNRS, UMR 7266, Littoral Environm & Soc LIENSs, 2 Rue Olympe Gouges, F-17042 La Rochelle 01 - France
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Oceanog LabQOM, Lab Quim Organ Marinha, Praca Oceanog 191, BR-05508120 Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
[3] Univ Vale Rio dos Sinos, Lab Omitol & Anim Marinhos, Av Unisinos 950, BR-93022750 Sao Leopoldo, RS - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: Chemosphere; v. 214, p. 866-876, JAN 2019.
Web of Science Citations: 1
Abstract

Despite typically not being taken into account (usually in favour of the `global distillation' process), the input of persistent organic pollutants (POPS) through biological activities can be indeed relevant at the local scale in terrestrial polar environments when seabird colonies are considered. Seabirds can bio-accumulate and biomagnify POPs, gather in large numbers and excrete on land during their reproductive season, thus making them locally as relevant secondary sources of POPS. The first part of this study indicated that these colonies act as so for several essential and non-essential trace elements, and this second part tests the same hypothesis concerning POPS using the very same samples. Lichens (n = 55), mosses (n = 58) and soil (n = 37) were collected from 13 locations in the South Shetlands Archipelago during the austral summers of 2013-14 and 2014-15. They were divided in colony (within the colony itself for soil and within and surrounding the colony for vegetation) and control (at least 150 m away from any colony interference) and analysed for POPs such as organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers and stable isotopes (C and N). Results showed that colonies act clearly as a secondary source for PCBs and likely for hexachlorobenzene. As in the first part, probable local sources other than the colonies themselves are hypothesised because of high concentrations found in control sites. Again, soil seemed the most adequate matrix for the intended purposes especially because of some particularities in the absorption of animal-derived organic matter by vegetation, pointed out by stable isotope analyses. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 14/15989-0 - Vegetation and soil as indicators of relevant secondary pollutants sources in Antarctic ecosystems
Grantee:Caio Vinícius Zecchin Cipro
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral
FAPESP's process: 15/07209-8 - Vegetation and soil as indicators of relevant secondary pollutants sources in Antarctic ecosystems
Grantee:Caio Vinícius Zecchin Cipro
Support Opportunities: Scholarships abroad - Research Internship - Post-doctor