Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Spatial distribution of risks for work-related injuries in a city of Southeastern e Brazil

Full text
Author(s):
Lia Thieme Oikawa Zangirolani [1] ; Ricardo Cordeiro [2] ; Maria Angélica Tavares de Medeiros [3] ; Celso Stephan [4]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Programa de pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva - Brasil
[2] Unicamp. FCM. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social - Brasil
[3] Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Programa de pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva - Brasil
[4] Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Programa de pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 4
Document type: Journal article
Source: Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 42, n. 2, p. 287-293, 2008-04-00.
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess spatial distribution of risks for work-related injuries controlled for nutritional variables and other covariables. METHODS: Hospital-based spatial case-control study with work-related injuries spatial distribution as the main variable of interest. A total of 794 workers were selected between May and October 2004. Inclusion criteria for cases (N=263) were: worker with work-related injury; living in Piracicaba (Southeastern Brazil); age between 15 and 60 years old; and cared at an orthopedics and trauma center. Controls (N=531) met the same criteria for age and residence, but had non-work-related injuries and workers accompanying cases were included as well. Spatial distribution was estimated by adjusting a generalized additive model with geographical coordinates of cases and controls as spatial non-linear component and the remaining covariables as linear components. RESULTS: The variation of estimated spatial risks for work-related injuries controlled for gender (OR=1.87, p<0.001), schooling (OR=0.85, p<0.0001), self-employed (OR=0.36, p<0.01), and waist circumference (OR=0.98, p=0.05) showed that the mideastern area and north-to-south "strip" have higher risk for injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The use of geoprocessing tools and nutritional variables can provide input for understanding the universe of risks for work-related injuries. Further investigation exploring these factors is needed. (AU)