Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Environmental impact assessment of end-uses of biomethane

Full text
Author(s):
Ferreira, Samuel Fontenelle [1] ; Buller, Luz Selene [1] ; Berni, Mauro [2] ; Forster-Carneiro, Tania [1]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Sch Food Engn, Rua Monteiro Lobato 80, BR-13083862 Campinas, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Interdisciplinary Ctr Energy Planning NIPE, Rua Cora Coralina, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION; v. 230, p. 613-621, SEP 1 2019.
Web of Science Citations: 1
Abstract

The growing global population, hunger for energy and worried about climate change, demands the development of new sources of energy. In this scenario, biomass stands out due its renewability and availability. Biogas, one type of energy that results from the anaerobic digestion of organic materials, is composed of about 60% of methane and 35% of carbon dioxide, and can be converted to biomethane, a fuel with high energy content. Biomethane can be used in ovens for cooking, light-duty vehicles for transportation and heavy-duty vehicles for work. This study compared the impacts of the use of biomethane in all of these three end-uses applying the life cycle assessment methodology. Four impact categories were evaluated: acidification, climate change, eutrophication and photochemical oxidation, when replacing one traditional fossil fuel use for those biomethane end uses. The results showed that the replacement of Diesel Oil in heavy-duty vehicles was beneficial in all impact categories, the replacement of liquefied petroleum gas in gas ovens impacted positively only climate change and the replacement of gasoline-C in light-duty vehicles was disadvantageous (except for climate change). For all the uses, the replacement of the traditional fossil fuel by biomethane for climate change impact was beneficial. The contribution analysis showed that the burning of the fuel was the most relevant process for all four impact categories. This study aims to supply data for further analysis of the full life cycle of biomethane, considering the source of biomass, which can support a whole well-to-wheel approach. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 18/05999-0 - Waste2energy: integration of the supercritical and anaerobic digestion technologies for the management of water and food waste
Grantee:Tânia Forster Carneiro
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants
FAPESP's process: 11/19817-1 - Biorefinery in agricultural and food industry: recycling waste for production of new chemicals componds and biohydrogen
Grantee:Tânia Forster Carneiro
Support Opportunities: Program for Research on Bioenergy (BIOEN) - Young Investigators Grants
FAPESP's process: 18/14938-4 - Waste2energy: integration of supercritical technologies and anaerobic digestion through an automated system for the production of biofuel precursors
Grantee:Tânia Forster Carneiro
Support Opportunities: Research Grants - Young Investigators Grants - Phase 2