Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Evaluation of the professional practice environment of nursing in health institutions

Full text
Author(s):
Gasparino, Renata Cristina [1] ; Mendonca Ferreira, Thelen Daiana [1] ; Adami de Carvalho, Kamila Mariana [1] ; Alves Rodrigues, Elke Sandra [1] ; Abatte Tondo, Juliana Cristina [2] ; da Silva, Vanessa Abreu [1]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP - Brazil
[2] Novartis, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: Acta Paulista de Enfermagem; v. 32, n. 4, p. 449-455, JUL-AUG 2019.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the hospital environment where nursing per forms its practice comparing public and private hospitals and describing the characteristics that received unfavorable evaluation (<= 2.5 points) in the of professionals' perception. Methods: A comparative and cross-sectional study was conducted in live hospitals (two public hospitals A and it: and three private ones - C, D and hum a city in the connhyskle of the state of Sao Paulo, with a total of 1773 nursing professionals. The instruments used were: data sheet for characterization of the sample and the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale. In the data analysis. we used descriptive and inferential statistics. To compare the hospitals, we used the Kruskall Wallis test, followed by the Dunn post-test and the multinomial regression. Results: In the comparison of hospitals, D and E hospitals reached mean above the others and significant differences (p<0.0001) were obtained in relation to the five subscales of the instrument used. In the multinomial regression, hospital D obtained 5.8; hospital E 5.2; hospital C 3.0 and hospital A 2.7 chances of having a more favorable environment when compared to hospital B. Items with a sore lower than 2.5 were associated, especially, tack of opportunity for development, recognition, participatory management and proper sizing. Conclusion: Private hospitals showed better performance when compared to the public ones, and the characteristics that received the worst evaluation were related to the participation of nurses in hospital affairs based on quality, support of the managers to the team and adequacy of resources. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 16/20030-0 - THE PRACTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF RESULTS WITH PATIENTS, PROFESSIONALS AND INSTITUTIONS
Grantee:Renata Cristina Gasparino
Support type: Regular Research Grants