Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Clinical Evaluation of Noncarious Cervical Lesions of Different Extensions Restored With Bulk-fill or Conventional Resin Composite: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Full text
Author(s):
Correia, A. M. O. [1] ; Jurema, A. L. B. [1] ; Andrade, M. R. [2] ; Borges, A. L. S. [3] ; Bresciani, E. [1] ; Caneppele, T. M. F. [1]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Acad Grp Clin Res GAPEC, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP - Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP - Brazil
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: Operative Dentistry; v. 45, n. 1, p. E11-E20, JAN-FEB 2020.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Purpose: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the influence of the occlusogingival distance (OGD) of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the clinical performance of a regular bulk-fill resin composite and a regular nanofilled resin composite. Methods and Materials: A total of 140 restorations were randomly placed in 77 participants by one operator. NCCLs were divided into four groups (n=35) according to OGD (1.5 mm +/- 10% or 3 mm +/- 10%) and resin composites (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior {[}B] or Filtek Z350 XT {[}C]) used: 1.5 mm-B, 1.5 mm-C, 3 mm-B, and 3 mm-C. A two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) was applied following manufacturer instructions in all restorative procedures. Restorations were polished 1 week after placement. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline (7 days), 6 months, and 1 year by two calibrated examiners, according to the modified US Public Health Service criteria evaluating fractures/retention, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, recurrence of caries, anatomic form, postoperative sensitivity, and surface texture. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for intergroup comparison in each followup; the Friedman analysis of variance, followed by the least significant difference test (multiple comparisons) was used for intragroup comparison between baseline and follow-up times (alpha=0.05). Results: Two restorations were lost at 12 months (1 for 1.5 mm-B and 1 for 3 mm-B). The retention rates at 12 months were 100% for 1.5 mm-C, 97% for 1.5 mm-B, 100% for 3 mm-C; and 97% for 3 mm-B, with no statistical difference among the groups (p=0.570). At 12 months, a statistically significant difference was found among the follow-up times for the same group (1.5 mm-B, 1.5 mm-C, and 3 mm-B) regarding the marginal staining criterion; moreover, the 3 mm-C group showed a significant difference from 6 months. No significant difference was found for the other parameters. Conclusion: Both resin composites showed acceptable clinical performance, and the OGD of NCCLs did not influence the clinical performance of resin composite restorations after 12 months. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 16/14429-7 - EFFECT OF CAVITY GEOMETRY OF NON CARIOUS CERVICAL LESIONS AND TYPE OF RESIN COMPOSITE ON RESTORATIVE SUCCESS RATE - IN VITRO, IN SILICO, AND IN VIVO OBSERVATIONS, AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Grantee:Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants