Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Use of Alcohol Mixed with Energy Drinks Increases the Prevalence of Driving Violations among Brazilian Truck Drivers

Full text
Author(s):
de Oliveira, Lucio Garcia [1, 2] ; Eckschmidt, Frederico [3] ; Leyton, Vilma [1] ; de Carvalho, Heraclito Barbosa [3]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo FMUSP, Sch Med, Dept Legal Med Eth & Occupat Hlth, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Fundacao ABC, Sch Med, Dept Neurosci, Av Lauro Gomes 2000, BR-09060870 Santo Andre, SP - Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo FMUSP, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE; v. 55, n. 10 APR 2020.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Background: The use of alcohol mixed with energy drinks (AmED) has been reported to be associated with a variety of unsafe driving practices. Truck drivers are vulnerable to driving violations, particularly because of their engagement in drug use. The use of AmED among these professionals remains unknown. Aim: To estimate the prevalence of AmED use and its association with driving violations among truck drivers. Methods: 684 drivers were recruited in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The use of drugs was reported. Drivers were split into three groups: (a) alcohol abstainers (AA); (b) alcohol-only users (AO); and (c) users of AmED. Intergroup comparisons were performed by polynomial logistic regression (the reference category was AO). We also performed Poisson regression analysis to obtain the prevalence ratio; the significance level was stipulated at 5%. Results: The prevalence of drivers reporting the use of AmED was 16.8%. Users of AmED (a) were younger, (b) were less experienced drivers, (c) had a heavier pattern of alcohol use, (d) used illicit drugs more frequently, and (e) had poorer sleep quality than AO subjects. A higher prevalence of drivers who had arguments or fights while driving (PR = 1.71) and of drivers who drove unbelted (PR = 1.66) ingested AmED than of AO subjects. Conclusions/importance: The use of AmED increased the prevalence of driving violations beyond the risks commonly attributed to alcohol use. We suggest additional investments in preventative measures based on the beverage category and a revision of the work organization of truck drivers to reduce their health and social risks. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 11/11682-0 - Study on polydrug use, cognitive, mental, and emotional functioning and sleep disorders among truck drivers in the State of São Paulo
Grantee:Lúcio Garcia de Oliveira
Support Opportunities: Research Grants - Young Investigators Grants