| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Orion Noda
[1]
Total Authors: 1
|
| Affiliation: | [1] King’s College London - Reino Unido
Total Affiliations: 1
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE POLITICA INTERNACIONAL; v. 63, n. 1 2020-07-27. |
| Abstract | |
Abstract The field of International Relations (IR) is barely ‘international’. Scholars have voiced their concerns and as a result, we have witnessed calls for diversity and inclusion in IR, be it in publication or in syllabi. Notwithstanding, the misrepresentation of non-Western scholars in the production of knowledge is significant. This article sheds light on the dynamics of publishing from a non-Western perspective and reinforces Post-Colonial epistemological critiques in IR. Based on the latest dataset from the International Studies Association (ISA)’s journals, this article argues that the current setting of IR journals is not suited for and receptive of non-Western scholars and epistemologies. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 19/11895-5 - Symbolism and the identity-behaviour nexus: symbolic perceptions of US nuclear history and the NPT |
| Grantee: | Orion Siufi Noda |
| Support Opportunities: | Scholarships abroad - Research Internship - Doctorate |