Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Effect of restorative treatment with endocrown and ferrule on the mechanical behavior of anterior endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro analysis

Full text
Author(s):
Silva-Sousa, Alice Correa [1, 2] ; Moris, Izabela C. M. [1] ; Simoes Barbosa, Ana Flavia [1] ; Correa Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha [1] ; Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao [2] ; Ferreira Pires, Cassiano Ricardo [2] ; Gomes, Erica Alves [1]
Total Authors: 7
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Ribeirao Preto UNAERP, Sch Dent, Ribeirao Preto, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo FORP USP, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Restorat Dent, Ribeirao Preto, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS; v. 112, DEC 2020.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of endocrown and ferrule restorative treatment on the mechanical behavior of anterior endodontically treated teeth. Human canines were treated endodontically and distributed in five groups (n = 10): sound teeth (S), crown associated with glass fiber post (GFP) and ferrule (GFP(f+)) and that without ferrule (GFP(f-)), and endocrown with ferrule (Ef+) and that without ferrule (Ef-). The crowns were obtained in lithium disilicate-based glass ceramic and cemented with resin. Thermomechanical loading (TL) was performed with progressive load of 80, 120, 160, 200, 240, 280, and 320 N with 20,000 cycles each, 140,000 cycles in total, frequency of 5 Hz, and temperature variation of 5 degrees C-55 degrees C, followed by fracture resistance testing with load cel l of 1000 Kgf and crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine. Failu r e mode has been evaluated. Data were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p < 0.05) for TL and one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05) for fracture resistance. TL showed higher number offractures for groups without ferrule (GFP(f-) = 7, GFP(f+) = 3, Ef- = 10, and Ef+ = 2) and lower mean fracture load probability (GFP(f+) = 300 N, GFP(f-) = 280 N, Ef+ = 320 N, Ef- = 188 N) than those with ferrule. Regarding fracture, teeth rehabilitated with GFP were more resistant to endocrowns with ferrule (p < 0.05). A higher percentage of type III failures after fatigue and type II failures af ter fracture were found. In conclusion, rehabilitation using GFP with ferrule is more favorable for anterior teeth, but the use of endocrown with ferrule proved feasible. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 18/22823-2 - Effect of restorative treatment with endocrown and ferrule on mechanical behavior of anterior teeth treated endodontically: in vitro analysis
Grantee:Alice Corrêa Silva Sousa
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Scientific Initiation