Development of a Comprehensive Outcome Measure for Motor Coordination; Step 1: Three-Phase Content Validity Process

Author(s)

Alouche, Sandra R. ^{[1, 2, 3]} ; Molad, Roni ^{[2, 3]} ; Demers, Marika ^{[2, 4, 3]} ; Levin, Mindy F. ^{[2, 3]}

Affiliation

^[1] Univ Cidade Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo - Brazil

^[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ - Canada

^[3] Jewish Rehabil Hosp Site, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Rehabil, Montreal, PQ - Canada

^[4] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90007 - USA

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR; v. 35, n. 2, p. 185-193, FEB 2021.
• Web of Science Citations: 1

Abstract

Background Motor coordination, the ability to produce context-dependent organized movements in spatial and temporal domains, is impaired after neurological injuries. Outcome measures assessing coordination mostly quantify endpoint performance variables (ie, temporal qualities of whole arm movement) but not movement quality (ie, trunk and arm joint displacements). Objective To develop an outcome measure to assess coordination of multiple body segments at both endpoint trajectory and movement quality levels, based on observational kinematics, in adults with neurological injuries. Methods A 3-phase study was used to develop the Comprehensive Coordination Scale (CCS): instrument development, Delphi process, and focus group meeting. The CCS was constructed from common tests used in clinical practice and research. Rating scales for different behavioral elements were developed to guide analysis. For content validation, 8 experts (ie, neurological clinicians/researchers) answered questionnaires about relevance, comprehension, and feasibility of each test and rating scale. A focus group conducted with 6 of 8 experts obtained consensus on rating scale and instruction wording, and identified gaps. Three additional experts reviewed the revised CCS content to obtain a final version. Results Experts identified a gap regarding assessment of hand/finger coordination. The CCS final version is composed of 6 complementary tests of coordination: finger-to-nose, arm-trunk, finger, lower extremity, and 2- and 4-limb interlimb coordination. Constructs include spatial and temporal variables totaling 69 points. Higher scores indicate better performance. Conclusions The CCS may be an important, understandable and feasible outcome measure to assess spatial and temporal coordination. CCS measurement properties are presented in the companion article. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 18/04544-9 - Towards a personalized approach to motor recovery after stroke with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
• Grantee: Sandra Regina Alouche
• Support Opportunities: Scholarships abroad - Research