Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Analysis of microorganisms in periapical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Full text
Author(s):
Bronzato, Juliana D. [1] ; Bomfim, Rafael A. [2] ; Hayasida, Giovanna Z. P. [3] ; Curi, Mariana [3] ; Estrela, Carlos [4] ; Paster, Bruce J. [5] ; Gomes, Brenda P. F. A. [1]
Total Authors: 7
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Endodont Div, Dept Restorat Dent, UNICAMP, Av Limeira 901, BR-13414903 Piracicaba, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Sch Dent, Dept Community Hlth, Campo Grande, MS - Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Math & Comp Sci, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Goiania, Go - Brazil
[5] Forsyth Inst, Dept Microbiol, Cambridge - England
Total Affiliations: 5
Document type: Review article
Source: ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY; v. 124, APR 2021.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on prevalence of microorganisms and their viability/activity in endodontic periapical lesions. Design: Literature research was performed on five electronic biomedical databases from their start dates to June 2020. Only studies evaluating the presence of microorganisms in periapical lesions in human permanent teeth with secondary/persistent infection were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility for inclusion, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. Meta-analysis and binominal tests were used to analyse the resulting data. Results: From the 1,313 records found, 23 full-texts were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The prevalence of microorganisms in endodontic periapical lesions was 87 % (95 % CI, 75-94) and the prevalence of viable/active microorganisms was 82 % (95 % CI, 66-91). There were statistical differences in the geographic area subgroup and between viable bacteria and active viruses. The most common detection method of microorganisms was the molecular one (69 %), and the most prevalent bacteria were the species Actinomyces, Fusobacterium and Prevotella (40 %). Most of the included studies had moderate risk of bias. Conclusions: The prevalence of microorganisms in endodontic periapical lesions was 87 % and the prevalence of viable/active microorganisms was 82 %. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 15/23479-5 - Microbiomes and immunobiological aspects in endodontic infections
Grantee:Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida Gomes
Support Opportunities: Research Projects - Thematic Grants