Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Chitosan and microbial inoculants in whole-plant soybean silage

Full text
Author(s):
de Morais, J. P. G. [1] ; Cantoia Junior, R. [2] ; Garcia, T. M. [1] ; Capucho, E. [1] ; Campana, M. [1] ; Gandra, J. R. [3] ; Ghizzi, Lucas G. [4] ; Del Valle, T. A. [5]
Total Authors: 8
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Agr Sci Ctr, Dept Biotechnol Vegetal & Anim Prod, BR-13600970 Araras - Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Maringa, Umuarama Campus, BR-87506370 Umuarama, PR - Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Southern & Southeastern Para, Inst Agr & Reg Dev, BR-68555410 Maraba - Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Dept Anim Nutr & Prod, BR-13635900 Pirassununga - Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Rural Sci Ctr, Dept Anim Sci, BR-97105340 Santa Maria, RS - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 5
Document type: Journal article
Source: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE; v. 159, n. 3-4, p. 227-235, APR 2021.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Whole-plant soybean silage (WPSS) is a potential high-protein roughage source for ruminant diets. However, WPSS can be difficult to ensile and fermentation is a challenge. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of chitosan and microbial inoculants on fermentation profile, fermentation losses, chemical composition, and in vitro degradation of WPSS. Forty experimental silos (PVC tubing with 28 cm i.d. and 25 cm height) were produced. Soybean plants from 10 plots were ensiled in a completely randomized block design to evaluate the following treatments: (1) control (CON): WPSS without additives; (2) chitosan (CHI): WPSS additive with 6 g/kg DM of chitosan; (3) LBB: WPSS treated with 5.0 x 10(7) colony-forming units (CFU) of Lactobacillus buchneri (NCIM 40788) per kg of fresh matter and (4) LPP: WPSS treated with 1.6 x 10(8) CFU of Lactobacillus plantarum and 1.6 x 10(8) CFU of Pediococcus acidilactici per kg of fresh matter. Silos were opened 120 days after ensiling. Microbial inoculants reduced silage pH, whereas LPP-treated silos showed the lowest concentration of NH3-N, ethanol, butyric, acetic, branched-chain, and propionic organic acids. LBB-treatment decreased lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count relative to other treatments, and LPP-treatment showed the lowest fermentation losses, improving dry matter (DM) recovery. Relative to other treatments, LPP increased silage DM, organic matter, and decreased acid detergent insoluble crude protein (CP), improving DM and neutral detergent fibre in vitro degradation. Treatments showed no effect on silage aerobic stability. Thus, LPP-treatment improves fermentation profile, reduces fermentation losses, and increases the nutritional value of WPSS. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 17/15457-7 - Evaluation of chitosan and microbial inoculants as additives on silages of sugarcane, Mombaça grass, high moisture corn and whole soybean plant
Grantee:Mariana Campana
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants