Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

THREAT RHETORIC AND SECURITIZATION: us immigration policy in the Trump administration

Full text
Author(s):
Flávio Contrera [1] ; Karina Lilia Pasquariello Mariano [2] ; Roberto Goulart Menezes [3]
Total Authors: 3
Affiliation:
[1] Universidade Estadual Paulista - Brasil
[2] Universidade Estadual Paulista - Brasil
[3] Universidade de Brasília - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais; v. 37, n. 108 2021-11-26.
Abstract

Abstract: This article aims to show that Donald Trump's changes in US migration policy were driven by threat rhetoric with the purpose of securitizing immigration. Starting from the binomial “I-other” to analyze the Executive's discourses and unilateral actions, we used the method of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to identify the discursive strategies that mobilized the “us against them” debate. In line with the theoretical assumptions of the Copenhagen School, we argue that Trump built a movement to securitize migration policy by employing a narrative in which Latin Americans and Muslims represent a threat to Americans and the United States. However, we conclude that this movement was incomplete, as it did not engender legitimacy before most of public opinion, encountered resistance to its implementation in the Judiciary and in state governments and did not foster the forging of a consensus in the Legislative that would result in a coherent and comprehensive reform of the migration policy. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 19/20181-6 - Executive order as a foreign policy tool: from George H. W. Bush to Donald Trump (1989-2021)
Grantee:Flávio Contrera
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral