Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Anaerobic Contribution Determined in Free-Swimming: Sensitivity to Maturation Stages and Validity

Full text
Author(s):
Campos, Eduardo Zapaterra ; Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto ; Silva, Maria Souza ; Arruda, Tarine Botta ; Gobbi, Ronaldo Bucken ; Manchado-Gobatto, Fulvia Barros ; Papoti, Marcelo
Total Authors: 7
Document type: Journal article
Source: FRONTIERS IN SPORTS AND ACTIVE LIVING; v. 4, p. 11-pg., 2022-05-17.
Abstract

Evaluation of anaerobic contribution is important under swimming settings (training and modification through ages), therefore, it is expected to change during maturation. The accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) method can be used to determine the contribution of nonoxidative energy during swimming; however, it requires several days of evaluation. An alternative method to estimate anaerobic contribution evaluation (AC(ALT)), which can also be evaluated without snorkel (i.e., free-swimming, AC(FS)), has been proposed; however, these methods have never been compared. Thus, this study (i) analyzed the effect of maturation stage on AC(FS) during maximal 400 m swimming (Part I), and (ii) compared AOD with AC(ALT) and AC(FS), determined in a maximal 400 m effort (Part II). In Part I, 34 swimmers were divided into three groups, according to maturation stages (early-pubertal, middle-pubertal, and pubertal), and subjected to a maximal 400 m free-swimming to determine AC(FS). In Part II, six swimmers were subjected to one 400 m maximal effort, and four submaximal constant efforts. The AOD was determined by the difference between the estimated demand and accumulated oxygen during the entire effort. The AC(ALT) and AC(FS) (for Part I as well) was assumed as the sum of lactic and alactic anaerobic contributions. AC(FS) was higher in pubertal (3.8 +/- 1.1 L) than early (2.1 +/- 0.9 L) and middle pubertal group (2.4 +/- 1.1 L). No difference was observed among absolute AOD (3.2 +/- 1.3 L), AC(ALT) (3.2 +/- 1.5 L), and AC(FS) (4.0 +/- 0.9 L) (F = 3.6; p = 0.06). Relative AOD (51.8 +/- 12.2 mL center dot kg(-1)), AC(ALT) (50.5 +/- 14.3 mL center dot kg(-1)), and AC(FS) (65.2 +/- 8.8 mL center dot kg(-1)) presented main effect (F = 4.49; p = 0.04), without posthoc difference. The bias of AOD vs. AC(ALT) was 0.04 L, and AOD vs. AC(FS) was -0.74 L. The limits of agreement between AOD and AC(ALT) were +0.9 L and -0.8 L, and between AOD and AC(FS) were +0.7 L and -2.7 L. It can be concluded that AC(FS) determination is a feasible tool to determine anaerobic contribution in young swimmers, and it changes during maturation stages. Also, AC(FS) might be useful to measure anaerobic contribution in swimmers, especially because it allows greater speeds. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 13/15322-3 - Maximal accumulated oxygen deficit determination using the backward extrapolation technique in swimmers, runners and cyclists
Grantee:Marcelo Papoti
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants