Influence of Diabetes Mellitus in urinary continence, sexuality and quality of lif...
The relationship between functional evaluation, electrical activity and muscle vol...
Full text | |
Author(s): |
Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco
[1]
;
Adriana de Souza Caroci
[2]
;
Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos de Oliveira
[3]
;
Maria Helena Baena de Moraes Lopes
[4]
Total Authors: 4
|
Affiliation: | [1] Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem - Brasil
[2] Centro Universitário Adventista de São Paulo - Brasil
[3] Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Enfermagem - Brasil
[4] Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 4
|
Document type: | Journal article |
Source: | Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem; v. 18, n. 6, p. 1138-1144, 2010-12-00. |
Abstract | |
Digital vaginal palpation performed during clinical practice can help diagnose urinary, intestinal and sexual disorders, while perineometry is more useful for performing perineal exercises with biofeedback. This study verifies whether there is a correlation between values of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength (PFMS) obtained through perineometry performed with an electronic perineometer and through digital vaginal palpation using the Oxford scale. This is a prospective cohort study with 330 measurements carried out in 110 women. Data were collected from 2007 to 2008 in the health service system in Itapecerica da Serra, São Paulo, Brazil. Evaluations were carried out at three points in time: up to 12 weeks of pregnancy; between 36-40 weeks; and between 42-60 days postpartum. The Spearman coefficient indicated a strong positive correlation between the two evaluation methods for the three evaluations (p<0.0001). The conclusion is that both methods are valid for measuring PFMS during pregnancy and after delivery. (AU) |