| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
José Luís Trevizan Chiomento
[1]
;
Fabiola Stockmans De Nardi
[2]
;
Luiza Alessandra Grando
[3]
;
Thomas dos Santos Trentin
[4]
;
Jéfferson Anzolin
[5]
;
Gustavo Eduardo Albrecht
[6]
;
Jaqueline Huzar-Novakowiski
[7]
;
Letícia Silva Pereira Basílio
[8]
;
Gean Charles Monteiro
[9]
;
Giuseppina Pace Pereira Lima
[10]
Total Authors: 10
|
| Affiliation: | [1] Universidade de Passo Fundo. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia - Brasil
[2] Centro Universitário do Instituto de Desenvolvimento Educacional do Alto Uruguai - Brasil
[3] Universidade de Passo Fundo. Curso de Agronomia - Brasil
[4] Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Solos e Nutrição de Plantas - Brasil
[5] Universidade de Passo Fundo. Curso de Agronomia - Brasil
[6] Universidade de Passo Fundo. Curso de Agronomia - Brasil
[7] Universidade de Passo Fundo. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia - Brasil
[8] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Instituto de Biociências. Departamento de Química e Bioquímica - Brasil
[9] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Instituto de Biociências. Departamento de Química e Bioquímica - Brasil
[10] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Instituto de Biociências. Departamento de Química e Bioquímica - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 10
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | Bragantia; v. 83, 2024-05-24. |
| Abstract | |
ABSTRACT Seven strawberry genotypes were analyzed in order to differentiate fruit production and quality. The discarded leaves (by-product) were also used to characterize their phytochemical profile with a view to potential use in the pharmaceutical and agricultural industries. The multivariate analysis gave rise to heterogeneous groups among the seven genotypes. ‘Fronteras’ and ‘Monterey’ were the most productive. ‘Camino Real’ produced fruits with the highest polyphenols concentrations. ‘Fronteras’ produced leaves with the best phytochemical profile and, together with ‘Camino Real’, the highest antioxidant activity. The genotypes differ in terms of the yield and fruit, and leaf phytochemical profiles. ‘Camino Real’ can be used to optimize and market all the organs produced (fruits and leaves) and ‘Fronteras’ to increase the fruit yield and the use of leaves as a cultivation by-product. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 16/22665-2 - Post-harvest technologies impact on the content of bioactive compounds in bananas, grape juice and turmeric |
| Grantee: | Giuseppina Pace Pereira Lima |
| Support Opportunities: | Regular Research Grants |