Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

A Semi-Tethered Test for Power Assessment in Running

Full text
Author(s):
Lima, M. C. S. [1] ; Ribeiro, L. F. P. [2] ; Papoti, M. [3] ; Santiago, P. R. P. [4] ; Cunha, S. A. [5] ; Martins, L. E. B. [5] ; Gobatto, C. A. [6]
Total Authors: 7
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Oeste Paulista, Lab Fisiol Exercicio, Presidente Prudente - Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Santa Cruz, Dept Ciencias Saude, BR-45662900 Ilheus - Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Presidente Prudente - Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Educ Fis & Esporte Ribeirao Preto, BR-14049 Ribeirao Preto - Brazil
[5] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Ciencias Esporte, Campinas, SP - Brazil
[6] Univ Estadual Campinas, Fac Ciencias Aplicadas, Limeira - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 6
Document type: Journal article
Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE; v. 32, n. 7, p. 529-534, JUL 2011.
Web of Science Citations: 9
Abstract

We analyzed the usefulness of a semi-tethered field running test (STR) and the relationships between indices of anaerobic power, anaerobic capacity and running performance in 9 trained male sprinters (22.2 +/- 2.9 yrs, 176 +/- 1 cm, 68.0 +/- 9.4 kg). STR involved an all out 120 m run attached to an apparatus that enabled power calculation from force and velocity measures. Subjects also carried out a cycloergometer Win-gate Anaerobic Test (WT), an all out 300 m run and had accessed their maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) on a treadmill. Peak and mean powers attained in STR (1 720 +/- 221 and 1 391 +/- 201 W) were greater but significantly related (r=0.82; P<0.01) to those in the WT (808 +/- 130 and 603 +/- 87 W). In addition, power measures derived from the STR were stronger related to running performance compared to those from the WT (r=0.81-0.94 vs. 0.68-0.84; P<0.05). Relationships between MAOD and most power indices were only weak to moderate. These results support the usefulness of STR for specific power assessment in field running and suggest that anaerobic power and capacity are not related entities, irrespective of having been evaluated using similar or dissimilar exercise modes. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 09/08535-5 - Standardization and validity of aerobic and anaerobic tests in field and laboratory, using free, tethered and half-tethered running, in endurance and sprint runners
Grantee:Claudio Alexandre Gobatto
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants