| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Mattiello, Lucia
[1]
;
Kirst, Matias
[2]
;
da Silva, Felipe R.
[3]
;
Jorge, Renato A.
[4]
;
Menossi, Marcelo
[1]
Total Authors: 5
|
| Affiliation: | [1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Biol, Dept Genet Evolucao & Bioagentes, Lab Genoma Func, Campinas, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Florida, Sch Forest Resources & Conservat, Plant Mol & Cellular Biol Program, Genet Inst, Gainesville, FL 32611 - USA
[3] Empresa Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuaria, Ctr Nacl Pesquisa Recursos Genet & Biotecnol, Brasilia, DF - Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Quim, Dept Fisicoquim, Campinas, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 4
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | BMC PLANT BIOLOGY; v. 10, SEP 9 2010. |
| Web of Science Citations: | 27 |
| Abstract | |
Background: Aluminum (Al) toxicity is one of the most important yield-limiting factors of many crops worldwide. The primary symptom of Al toxicity syndrome is the inhibition of root growth leading to poor water and nutrient absorption. Al tolerance has been extensively studied using hydroponic experiments. However, unlike soil conditions, this method does not address all of the components that are necessary for proper root growth and development. In the present study, we grew two maize genotypes with contrasting tolerance to Al in soil containing toxic levels of Al and then compared their transcriptomic responses. Results: When grown in acid soil containing toxic levels of Al, the Al-sensitive genotype (S1587-17) showed greater root growth inhibition, more Al accumulation and more callose deposition in root tips than did the tolerant genotype (Cat100-6). Transcriptome profiling showed a higher number of genes differentially expressed in S1587-17 grown in acid soil, probably due to secondary effects of Al toxicity. Genes involved in the biosynthesis of organic acids, which are frequently associated with an Al tolerance response, were not differentially regulated in both genotypes after acid soil exposure. However, genes related to the biosynthesis of auxin, ethylene and lignin were up-regulated in the Al-sensitive genotype, indicating that these pathways might be associated with root growth inhibition. By comparing the two maize lines, we were able to discover genes up-regulated only in the Al-tolerant line that also presented higher absolute levels than those observed in the Al-sensitive line. These genes encoded a lipase hydrolase, a retinol dehydrogenase, a glycine-rich protein, a member of the WRKY transcriptional family and two unknown proteins. Conclusions: This work provides the first characterization of the physiological and transcriptional responses of maize roots when grown in acid soil containing toxic levels of Al. The transcriptome profiles highlighted several pathways that are related to Al toxicity and tolerance during growth in acid soil. We found several genes that were not found in previous studies using hydroponic experiments, increasing our understanding of plant responses to acid soil. The use of two germplasms with markedly different Al tolerances allowed the identification of genes that are a valuable tool for assessing the mechanisms of Al tolerance in maize in acid soil. (AU) | |