Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

The erosion and abrasion-inhibiting effect of TiF4 and NaF varnishes and solutions on enamel in vitro

Full text
Author(s):
Levy, Flavia Mauad [1] ; Magalhaes, Ana Carolina [1] ; Gomes, Marina Franciscon [1] ; Comar, Livia Picchi [1] ; Rios, Daniela [2] ; Rabelo Buzalaf, Marilia Afonso [1]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Biol Sci, Bauru Sch Dent, Bauru, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Pediat Dent Orthodont & Publ Hlth, Bauru Sch Dent, Bauru, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry; v. 22, n. 1, p. 11-16, JAN 2012.
Web of Science Citations: 23
Abstract

Objective. Previous in vitro study has shown that TiF(4) varnish might reduce enamel erosion. No data regarding the effect of this experimental varnish on enamel erosion plus abrasion, however, are available so far. Thus, this in vitro study aimed to analyse the effect of TiF4 compared with NaF varnishes and solutions, to protect against enamel erosion with or without abrasion. Methods. Enamel specimens were pre-treated with experimental-TiF4 (2.45% F), experimentalNaF (2.45% F), NaF-Duraphat (2.26% F), and placebo varnishes; NaF (2.26% F) and TiF4 (2.45% F) solutions. Controls remained untreated. The erosive challenge was performed using a soft drink (pH 2.6) 4 u 90 s / day (ERO) and the toothbrushing abrasion (ERO+ ABR) 2 u 10 s / day, for 5 days. Between the challenges, the specimens were exposed to artificial saliva. Enamel loss was measured profilometrically (lm). Results. Kruskal-Wallis / Dunn tests showed that all fluoridated varnishes (TiF4-ERO: 0.53 +/- 0.20, ERO+ ABR: 0.65 +/- 0.19/ NaF-ERO: 0.94 +/- 0.18, ERO+ ABR: 1.74 +/- 0.37 / Duraphat-ERO: 1.00 +/- 0.37, ERO+ ABR: 1.72 +/- 0.58) were able to significantly reduce enamel loss when compared with placebo varnish (ERO: 3.45 +/- 0.41 / ERO+ ABR: 3.20 +/- 0.66) (P < 0.0001). Placebo varnish, control (ERO: 2.68 +/- 0.53 / ERO+ ABR: 3.01 +/- 0.34), and fluoridated (NaF-ERO: 2.84 +/- 0.09 / ERO+ ABR: 2.40 +/- 0.21 / TiF4-ERO: 3.55 +/- 0.59 / ERO+ ABR: 4.10 +/- 0.38) solutions did not significantly differ from each other. Conclusion. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the TiF4 varnish seems to be a promising treatment to reduce enamel loss under mild erosive and abrasive conditions in vitro. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 08/07105-4 - Evaluation of the effect of an experimental TiF4 varnish compared to NaF varnishes and solutions and to TiF4 solution on erosion and abrasion of enamel and dentin: in vitro and in situ studies
Grantee:Ana Carolina Magalhães
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants
FAPESP's process: 08/03727-0 - Evaluation of the effect of an experimental titanium tetrafluoride varnish compared to sodium fluoride varnishes and solutions on erosion and abrasion of enamel and dentin in vitro and in situ
Grantee:Flavia Mauad Levy Abrahão
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral