Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Radiographic adenoid evaluation - suggestion of referral parameters

Full text
Author(s):
Feres, Murilo F. N. [1] ; Hermann, Juliana S. [2] ; Sallum, Ana C. [2] ; Pignatari, Shirley S. N. [2]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Francisco, Fac Odontol, BR-12900000 Braganca Paulista, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: Jornal de Pediatria; v. 90, n. 3, p. 279-285, MAY-JUN 2014.
Web of Science Citations: 1
Abstract

OBJECTIVE:this study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of current radiographic measurements, which were originally conceived to evaluate adenoid hypertrophy, as potential referral parameters.METHODS:children aged from 4 to 14 years, of both genders, who presented nasal obstruction complaints, were subjected to cavum radiography. Radiographic examinations (n = 120) were evaluated according to categorical and quantitative parameters, and data were compared to gold-standard videonasopharyngoscopic examination, regarding accuracy (sensitivity, negative predictive value, specificity, and positive predictive value).RESULTS:radiographic grading systems presented low sensitivity for the identification of patients with two-thirds choanal space obstruction. However, some of these parameters presented relatively high specificity rates when three-quarters adenoid obstruction was the threshold of interest. Amongst the quantitative variables, a mathematical model was found to be more suitable for identifying patients with more than two-thirds obstruction.CONCLUSION:this model was shown to be potentially useful as a screening tool to include patients with, at least, two-thirds adenoid obstruction. Moreover, one of the categorical parameters was demonstrated to be relatively more useful, as well as a potentially safer assessment tool to exclude patients with less than three-quarters obstruction, to be indicated for adenoidectomy. (AU)