Comparative cytogenetic analysis of some species of the Dendropsophus microcephalus group (Anura Hylidae) in the light of phylogenetic inferences

• Grant number: 13/16560-5
• Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants - Publications - Scientific article
• Field of knowledge: Biological Sciences - Genetics - Animal Genetics
• Principal Investigator: Luciana Bolsoni Lourenço
• Grantee: Luciana Bolsoni Lourenço
• Host Institution: Instituto de Biologia (IB). Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Campinas , SP, Brazil

Abstract

Background: Dendropsophus is a monophyletic anuran genus with a diploid number of 30 chromosomes as an important synapomorphy. However, the internal phylogenetic relationships of this genus are poorly understood.Interestingly, an intriguing interspecific variation in the telocentric chromosome number has been useful in species identification. To address certain uncertainties related to one of the species groups of Dendropsophus, the D.microcephalus group, we carried out a cytogenetic analysis combined with phylogenetic inferences based onmitochondrial sequences, which aimed to aid in the analysis of chromosomal characters. Populations ofDendropsophus nanus, Dendropsophus walfordi, Dendropsophus sanborni, Dendropsophus jimi and Dendropsophuselianeae, ranging from the extreme south to the north of Brazil, were cytogenetically compared. A mitochondrial region of the ribosomal 12S gene from these populations, as well as from 30 other species of Dendropsophus, was used for the phylogenetic inferences. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using maximum parsimony andBayesian analyses.Results: The species D. nanus and D. walfordi exhibited identical karyotypes (2n = 30; FN = 52), with four pairs oftelocentric chromosomes and a NOR located on metacentric chromosome pair 13. In all of the phylogenetic hypotheses, the paraphyly of D. nanus and D. walfordi was inferred. D. sanborni from Botucatu-SP and Torres-RS showed the same karyotype as D. jimi, with 5 pairs of telocentric chromosomes (2n = 30; FN = 50) and a terminalNOR in the long arm of the telocentric chromosome pair 12. Despite their karyotypic similarity, these species werenot found to compose a monophyletic group. Finally, the phylogenetic and cytogenetic analyses did not clusterthe specimens of D. elianeae according to their geographical occurrence or recognized morphotypes.Conclusions: We suggest that a taxonomic revision of the taxa D. nanus and D. walfordi is quite necessary. We also observe that the number of telocentric chromosomes is useful to distinguish among valid species in some cases,although it is unchanged in species that are not necessarily closely related phylogenetically. Therefore, inferences basedon this chromosomal character must be made with caution; a proper evolutionary analysis of the karyotypic variation in Dendropsophus depends on further characterization of the telocentric chromosomes found in this group. (AU)