Behaviour and environmental bioactivityon weeds of herbicides residualapplied on sugarcane residues in different soil with water conditions

Author(s)

Paulo Vinícius da Silva

• Document type: Doctoral Thesis
• Press: Piracicaba.
• Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALA/BC)
• Defense date: 2018-05-30

Examining board members

Pedro Jacob Christoffoleti; Caio Antonio Carbonari; Patrícia Andréa Monquero; Leandro Tropaldi

• Advisor: Pedro Jacob Christoffoleti; Patrícia Andréa Monquero

Abstract

Herbicides applied to sugar cane systems, directly on the soils our by residues, are available to transport, retention and transformation phenomenon. In this context, the objective of this work was to evaluate the leaching and sorption of residual herbicides in soils with different physicochemical characteristics and in sugarcane residues. Four experiments were carried out. The first, was based on the bioassay methodology, followed the 8 x 2 x 2 factorial scheme, in a completely randomized design, with four replications, eight depths of the soil profile, two dry periods (0 and 30 days after application of the treatments (DAT) and two quantities of residues, this factorial was adopted individually for the herbicides amicarbazone (1225 g ia ha-1); imazapic (147 g i.a ha-1), sulfentrazone (800 g i.a ha-1) and tebuthiuron (900 g i.a ha-1). The herbicides were applied to the top of soil columns mounted in PVC tubes with 0 and 10 t ha-1 of straw, these treatments were submitted to the three different periods of dry (0 and 30 DATs), at the end of those times a 30 mm rainfall simulation and Cucumis sativus sowing (bioindicator plant), phytotoxicity (7, 10 and 15 DAE), dry mass and shoot height were evaluated. It was noted that the greatest phytotoxicity of the herbicide amicarbazone was in the 0-5 cm layer. And that periods of drought and straw decreased the mobility of this herbicide in the columns. In leaching tebuthiuron, imazapic and sulfentrazone the permanence of the product on the sugarcane straw during 30 DAT made the leaching of this herbicide minor. Thus, it can be concluded that the presence of straw on the soil surface coupled to the different periods of drought can affect the mobility of these herbicides in the environment. The second experiment consisted in the determination of coeficivity of adosorption and desorption (Kd and Koc) in 16 soils with different physicochemical characteristics, for the herbicides indaziflam, imazapic and amicarbazone. The C14- labeled radio-herbicide methodology was used to apply five different concentrations of the cold herbicides (0.125, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 ppm), associated with the different soils and herbicides radio -marked at the concentrations of 0.24 KBq of indaziflam, 0.26 KBq of imazapic or 0.20 KBq of amicarbazone, individually in each experimental unit. The concentration of radiolabelled herbicides present in the supernatant was determined by liquid scintillation spectroscopy (LSS) and by difference between the amount initially applied and the present in the soil solution, determining adsorption. Through the same process the herbicide desorption was also evaluated in four days of analysis For imazapic and amicarbazone, Kd values were low due to their high solubility in water; however, the adsorption of imazapic was strongly influenced by the pH of the soil, and for amicarbazone the adsorption and desorption was influenced by the organic matter and pH of the soils. For indaziflam, Kd was negatively correlated with clay content but was positively correlated with organic matter. The third experiment evaluated the adsorption of indaziflam, imazapic and amicarbazone in sugarcane straw. A typical study and batch equilibrium was conducted to determine adsorption and desorption at different concentrations of the herbicides. Sugarcane residues (0.27 g) was combined with three concentrations of the herbicides (0.125, 0.5 and 1 ppm) plus 0.24 KBq of indaziflam, 0.26 KBq imazapic or 0.20 KBq of labeled amicarbazone radio. The adsorption of indaziflam, imazapic and amicarbazone was evaluated 24, 48 and 120 hours, respectively, after the contact of sugarcane residues. Indaziflam adsorption was greater than 80% at all concentrations, while imazapic adsorption was below 7% at all concentrations. The adsorption of amicarbazone was less than 20% at all concentrations. Indaziflam desorption was 30%, 28.5% and 27.5% at 0.125, 0.5 and 1 ppm, respectively, after 5 days. Maximum desorption for amicarbazone was observed at 1 ppm with 11%. The desorption for imazapic was not determined due to the low initial adsorption. A fourth experiment, addressed the interception of herbicides by sugarcane straw through simulated rainfall in various amounts of precipitation (3, 6, 12 and 24 mm). Two amounts of sugarcane straw were uniformly spread over a stainless steel screen (5 t ha-1 and 10 t ha-1), then the screen was placed on a Pyrex® pan. The rain simulations occurred at 0 hr, 24 hrs and seven days after the treatments were applied. For indaziflam, a period of seven days after application of the herbicides on the sugarcane straw was simulated a precipitation of 24 mm resulting in the removal of only 25% of the adsorbed herbicide. For the herbicide imazapic the sugarcane straw did not present an expressive barrier to interception of this product. Thus, the characteristics of the herbicides, such as water solubility and Kow, can be used to determine their dynamics in sugarcane production systems, and the leaching, straw sorption and soil attributes can a predilection for agronomic behavior and environmental fate of residual herbicides. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 14/12127-8 - Behavior and environmental bioactivity on weeds herbicide residual applied on straw cane sugar in different soil water conditions
• Grantee: Paulo Vinicius da Silva
• Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate