Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Adriana Ofretorio de Oliveira Martin
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Master's Dissertation |
| Press: | Campinas, SP. |
| Institution: | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Faculdade de Educação |
| Defense date: | 2010-12-20 |
| Examining board members: |
Anna Regina Lanner de Moura;
Guilherme do Val Toledo Prado;
Elaine Sampaio Araújo;
Maria do Carmo de souza
|
| Advisor: | Anna Regina Lanner de Moura |
| Abstract | |
The main purpose of this research is to analyze the personal senses about the formative spaces for teaching practice produced by four students from the third year of the Pedagogy course at UNICAMP-SP-Brazil. The participants developed formative activities - reflective narratives, group teaching project, reflective portfolio and seminar of theoretical densification related to the teaching context of a Disciplinary Integration Project (Integrated Project), developed by three professors at the Faculty of Education and supported by CNPq. This is an interpretative study (GINZBURG, 2003) aimed at oral and written narratives produced by the individuals of the research about their formative experiences. Such reports were made in the second half of 2008, during the Supervised Training subject, which is related to the Integrated Project (IP). To compose the corpus, four written compositions of each individual and an interview with each group of the teaching project development were considered. In the analysis, we seek to interpret, in the light of Leontiev?s activity theory (1970, 1983, 2004) and Engeström (1999), the meanings and senses about the teaching practice produced by these individuals and related to the formative spaces. Through the analysis of the reflection of the four students, produced throughout a semester, including the oral report, it was possible to realize that the formative activities, requested in the context of the Supervised Training subject and linked to IP, consist of spaces of development to these students, since they attribute a personal sense to the execution of such tasks. It was also possible to notice, with more or less emphasis, depending on each individual, a tendency of meanings production aimed at some expectation of education for teaching practice in the aspects of the relation with the training course, with the child and with the future practice of being a teacher. Besides, we can observe the recurrence of meaning changes that happens from the beginning to the end of the semester with the four students whose reflections were analyzed. (AU) | |