Controversies in climatology: IPCC and the anthropogenic global warming

Author(s)

José Correa LEITE ^[1]

Affiliation

^[1] Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado. Faculdade de Comunicação - Brasil

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: Scientiae Studia; v. 13, n. 3, p. 643-677, 2015-09-00.

Abstract

ABSTRACTClimatology is at the center of one of the most polarized debates of today. It is presented as a confrontation between supporters of the existence of anthropogenic global warming and those who deny its existence. The key institution for this theme is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is both a scientific and political body. In this context, the debate arises merged with the political discussion on appropriate responses to global warming. However, contested on this ground, the deniers transfer the debate to the media, mobilizing pseudo-science to delegitimize the conclusions of the scientific disciplines related to climate understanding. Therefore, we have a deliberate production of large-scale ignorance on this subject, which requires the use of agnotology to unravel it. Thus, climatology reveals itself an exemplary space to study the historical and social roots of scientific knowledge and the tensions and conflicting trajectories inside it, the ethical dilemmas posed and the universalist possibilities of scientific knowledge in the age of technoscience. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 11/51614-3 - Origins and significance of technoscience: on relations among science, technology and society
• Grantee: Pablo Rubén Mariconda
• Support Opportunities: Research Projects - Thematic Grants